CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.621 > 0.486
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161 > 0.486 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.544 > 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.572
Total TP 2368 > 1798
Total TN 12465477 < 12465679
Total FP 1159 < 1618
Total FP CONTRA 149 < 166
Total FP INCONS 828 < 1179
Total FP COMP 182 < 273
Total FN 1981 < 2551
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2368
Total TN 12465477
Total FP 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 828
Total FP COMP 182
Total FN 1981
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00330 0.39 0.31 0.49 160 1988690 189 26 139 24 357
CRW_00411 0.31 0.25 0.40 122 1615195 206 23 163 20 374
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.36 146 1665818 288 38 223 27 349
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1798
Total TN 12465679
Total FP 1618
Total FP CONTRA 166
Total FP INCONS 1179
Total FP COMP 273
Total FN 2551
Total Scores
MCC 0.486
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.486 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.572
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.52 0.45 0.59 213 1178522 162 17 128 17 260
CRW_00250 0.57 0.50 0.66 237 1198568 130 20 101 9 241
CRW_00278 0.49 0.41 0.57 186 1129931 157 13 126 18 264
CRW_00280 0.53 0.42 0.67 192 1117973 105 9 86 10 261
CRW_00330 0.30 0.25 0.36 131 1988654 302 33 197 72 386
CRW_00411 0.42 0.35 0.49 173 1615153 226 27 150 49 323
CRW_00414 0.42 0.36 0.48 180 1665851 239 34 160 45 315
CRW_00789 0.51 0.40 0.65 179 1137510 120 5 92 23 268
PDB_01105 0.62 0.57 0.68 307 1433517 177 8 139 30 233

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.