CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) Contrafold
MCC 0.621 > 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161 > 0.469 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.544 > 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.488
Total TP 2368 > 1944
Total TN 12465477 > 12464842
Total FP 1159 < 2385
Total FP CONTRA 149 < 268
Total FP INCONS 828 < 1768
Total FP COMP 182 < 349
Total FN 1981 < 2405
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2368
Total TN 12465477
Total FP 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 828
Total FP COMP 182
Total FN 1981
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00330 0.39 0.31 0.49 160 1988690 189 26 139 24 357
CRW_00411 0.31 0.25 0.40 122 1615195 206 23 163 20 374
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.36 146 1665818 288 38 223 27 349
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1944
Total TN 12464842
Total FP 2385
Total FP CONTRA 268
Total FP INCONS 1768
Total FP COMP 349
Total FN 2405
Total Scores
MCC 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.469 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.488
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.50 0.48 0.52 228 1178444 227 20 188 19 245
CRW_00250 0.58 0.56 0.61 267 1198490 184 24 145 15 211
CRW_00278 0.44 0.42 0.47 190 1129849 240 28 189 23 260
CRW_00280 0.55 0.51 0.60 232 1117873 173 15 140 18 221
CRW_00330 0.33 0.32 0.33 166 1988512 422 56 281 85 351
CRW_00411 0.39 0.36 0.42 181 1615070 306 41 211 54 315
CRW_00414 0.36 0.37 0.36 181 1665721 382 54 269 59 314
CRW_00789 0.48 0.44 0.53 196 1137416 209 14 160 35 251
PDB_01105 0.58 0.56 0.60 303 1433467 242 16 185 41 237

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.