CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & RNAfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) RNAfold
MCC 0.621 > 0.386
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161 > 0.388 ± 0.058
Sensitivity 0.544 > 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.385
Total TP 2368 > 1687
Total TN 12465477 > 12464436
Total FP 1159 < 2974
Total FP CONTRA 149 < 443
Total FP INCONS 828 < 2256
Total FP COMP 182 < 275
Total FN 1981 < 2662
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and RNAfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNAfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNAfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and RNAfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNAfold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2368
Total TN 12465477
Total FP 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 828
Total FP COMP 182
Total FN 1981
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00330 0.39 0.31 0.49 160 1988690 189 26 139 24 357
CRW_00411 0.31 0.25 0.40 122 1615195 206 23 163 20 374
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.36 146 1665818 288 38 223 27 349
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top



Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1687
Total TN 12464436
Total FP 2974
Total FP CONTRA 443
Total FP INCONS 2256
Total FP COMP 275
Total FN 2662
Total Scores
MCC 0.386
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.388 ± 0.058
Sensitivity 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.385
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.42 0.42 0.42 197 1178408 288 34 241 13 276
CRW_00250 0.40 0.40 0.40 190 1198454 296 51 231 14 288
CRW_00278 0.42 0.41 0.43 186 1129828 264 31 211 22 264
CRW_00280 0.50 0.49 0.50 222 1117818 233 28 192 13 231
CRW_00330 0.31 0.32 0.30 165 1988473 454 70 307 77 352
CRW_00411 0.33 0.34 0.32 169 1614974 406 78 282 46 327
CRW_00414 0.28 0.29 0.27 143 1665688 437 80 314 43 352
CRW_00789 0.36 0.36 0.36 161 1137337 307 44 244 19 286
PDB_01105 0.48 0.47 0.49 254 1433456 289 27 234 28 286

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.