CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) Sfold
MCC 0.621 > 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161 > 0.457 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.544 > 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.530
Total TP 2368 > 1720
Total TN 12465477 < 12465576
Total FP 1159 < 1785
Total FP CONTRA 149 < 244
Total FP INCONS 828 < 1282
Total FP COMP 182 < 259
Total FN 1981 < 2629
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Sfold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2368
Total TN 12465477
Total FP 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 828
Total FP COMP 182
Total FN 1981
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00330 0.39 0.31 0.49 160 1988690 189 26 139 24 357
CRW_00411 0.31 0.25 0.40 122 1615195 206 23 163 20 374
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.36 146 1665818 288 38 223 27 349
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1720
Total TN 12465576
Total FP 1785
Total FP CONTRA 244
Total FP INCONS 1282
Total FP COMP 259
Total FN 2629
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.457 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.530
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.45 0.41 0.50 195 1178491 206 27 167 12 278
CRW_00250 0.50 0.46 0.54 221 1198516 206 28 161 17 257
CRW_00278 0.51 0.37 0.70 166 1130018 88 6 66 16 284
CRW_00280 0.60 0.55 0.66 250 1117881 149 21 108 20 203
CRW_00330 0.34 0.28 0.41 145 1988661 279 50 159 70 372
CRW_00411 0.39 0.32 0.47 157 1615171 217 28 147 42 339
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.38 146 1665840 278 40 199 39 349
CRW_00789 0.40 0.34 0.46 152 1137458 193 30 146 17 295
PDB_01105 0.60 0.53 0.67 288 1433540 169 14 129 26 252

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.