CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & MXScarna(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) MXScarna(20)
MCC 0.746 > 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.633 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.574
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.689
Total TP 1989 > 1677
Total TN 7954946 > 7954943
Total FP 607 < 1042
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 118
Total FP INCONS 371 < 639
Total FP COMP 165 < 285
Total FN 931 < 1243
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MXScarna(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MXScarna(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MXScarna(20)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1677
Total TN 7954943
Total FP 1042
Total FP CONTRA 118
Total FP INCONS 639
Total FP COMP 285
Total FN 1243
Total Scores
MCC 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.574
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.70 0.64 0.77 299 1192353 124 11 77 36 169
CRW_00326 0.49 0.45 0.53 227 1627679 267 35 169 63 275
CRW_00358 0.48 0.44 0.53 224 1674941 262 38 162 62 283
CRW_00590 0.72 0.67 0.78 303 1119366 134 11 76 47 149
CRW_00997 0.74 0.69 0.79 322 1135872 121 12 72 37 142
PDB_01120 0.66 0.57 0.76 302 1204732 134 11 83 40 225

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.