CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.746 > 0.504
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.512 ± 0.298
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.450
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.565
Total TP 1989 > 1314
Total TN 7954946 < 7955050
Total FP 607 < 1180
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 162
Total FP INCONS 371 < 851
Total FP COMP 165 < 167
Total FN 931 < 1606
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1314
Total TN 7955050
Total FP 1180
Total FP CONTRA 162
Total FP INCONS 851
Total FP COMP 167
Total FN 1606
Total Scores
MCC 0.504
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.298
Sensitivity 0.450
Positive Predictive Value 0.565
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.71 0.62 0.81 292 1192380 91 18 50 23 176
CRW_00326 0.36 0.34 0.38 172 1627656 314 50 232 32 330
CRW_00358 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1674979 406 62 324 20 507
CRW_00590 0.63 0.55 0.73 249 1119415 115 6 86 23 203
CRW_00997 0.73 0.69 0.77 319 1135862 125 18 79 28 145
PDB_01120 0.64 0.54 0.76 282 1204758 129 8 80 41 245

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.