CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.774 > 0.341
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.803 ± 0.099 > 0.211 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.780 > 0.118
Positive Predictive Value 0.773 < 1.000
Total TP 423 > 64
Total TN 37171 < 37654
Total FP 227 > 1
Total FP CONTRA 32 > 0
Total FP INCONS 92 > 0
Total FP COMP 103 > 1
Total FN 119 < 478
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 423
Total TN 37171
Total FP 227
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 103
Total FN 119
Total Scores
MCC 0.774
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.803 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.780
Positive Predictive Value 0.773
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_B 0.98 1.00 0.96 24 766 1 0 1 0 0
2L1F_A 0.98 1.00 0.96 23 739 1 0 1 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 35 10 2 23 2
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 29 0 6 23 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 64
Total TN 37654
Total FP 1
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 478
Total Scores
MCC 0.341
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.211 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.118
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 467 0 0 0 0 18
2KUR_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 460 0 0 0 0 12
2KUU_A 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 440 0 0 0 0 11
2KUV_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 9 430 0 0 0 0 10
2KUW_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 9 461 0 0 0 0 9
2L1F_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 791 0 0 0 0 24
2L1F_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 763 0 0 0 0 23
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.22 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 14
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2045 0 0 0 0 35
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1500 0 0 0 0 30
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 23
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2640 0 0 0 0 35
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2378 0 0 0 0 15
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 954 0 0 0 0 25
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 37
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2754 0 0 0 0 31
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.