CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	Afold		Cylofold
MCC	0.754	>	0.700
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.774 ± 0.089	>	0.751 ± 0.078
Sensitivity	0.769	>	0.685
Positive Predictive Value	0.746	>	0.724
Total TP	724	>	645
Total TN	55584	<	55663
Total FP	331	>	291
Total FP CONTRA	57	<	58
Total FP INCONS	189	>	188
Total FP COMP	85	>	45
Total FN	217	<	296
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of Afold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).

^top

Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	724
Total TN	55584
Total FP	331
Total FP CONTRA	57
Total FP INCONS	189
Total FP COMP	85
Total FN	217

Total Scores
MCC	0.754
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.774 ± 0.089
Sensitivity	0.769
Positive Predictive Value	0.746
Nr of predictions	50

^top

2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	16	355	0	0	0	0	0
2KXM_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	141	0	0	0	0	0
2KZL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	13	507	1	0	0	1	0
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.98	1.00	0.96	24	766	1	0	1	0	0
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.98	1.00	0.96	23	739	1	0	1	0	0
2L2K_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	17	332	0	0	0	0	0
2L3C_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	225	0	0	0	0	0
2L3E_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	228	1	0	0	1	0
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	30	955	0	0	0	0	0
2L5Z_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	102	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.61	0.69	11	512	6	0	5	1	7
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LDT_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	151	0	0	0	0	0
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	29	2411	8	0	0	8	0
2LWK_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	197	2	0	1	1	2
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.34	0.38	12	2013	21	1	19	1	23
2YIE_X	-	0.53	0.57	0.50	4	536	8	1	3	4	3
2YIE_Z	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	587	16	6	9	1	8
3ADB_C	-	0.85	0.85	0.85	28	1786	6	0	5	1	5
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.20	0.21	4	1108	17	4	11	2	16
3AM1_B	-	0.79	0.79	0.79	23	1437	6	0	6	0	6
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.83	0.86	0.81	30	2603	11	0	7	4	5
3J0L_7	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	504	15	1	14	0	10
3J0L_1	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	473	5	0	1	4	3
3J0L_h	-	0.87	0.81	0.93	26	2112	5	1	1	3	6
3J2C_O	-	0.70	0.68	0.72	28	3948	18	3	8	7	13
3NDB_M	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	44	3670	4	0	0	4	0
3NKB_B	-	0.69	0.74	0.67	14	714	7	0	7	0	5
3NMU_E	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	208	10	5	3	2	3
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.50	0.34	11	4732	38	6	15	17	11
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.81	0.81	25	2723	14	0	6	8	6
3OVS_D	-	0.82	0.83	0.83	10	204	2	0	2	0	2
3P22_G	-	0.91	0.91	0.91	10	301	1	0	1	0	1
3R4F_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	22	884	1	0	0	1	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SIU_F	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	137	0	0	0	0	0
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.92	1.00	11	143	0	0	0	0	1
3U4M_B	-	0.49	0.55	0.46	12	1250	14	3	11	0	10
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	1	0	0	1	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.55	0.56	18	1957	15	4	10	1	15
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.77	0.87	27	2765	8	0	4	4	8
3ZEX_E	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	8251	55	17	36	2	34
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.38	0.43	0.38	3	212	6	5	0	1	4
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.73	0.92	11	460	3	0	1	2	4
4FNJ_A	-	0.86	0.83	0.91	10	239	1	0	1	0	2
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	1	0	0	1	0

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	645
Total TN	55663
Total FP	291
Total FP CONTRA	58
Total FP INCONS	188
Total FP COMP	45
Total FN	296

Total Scores
MCC	0.700
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.751 ± 0.078
Sensitivity	0.685
Positive Predictive Value	0.724
Nr of predictions	50

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	16	355	0	0	0	0	0
2KXM_A	-	0.78	0.63	1.00	5	144	0	0	0	0	3
2KZL_A	-	0.83	0.69	1.00	9	511	1	0	0	1	4
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	770	0	0	0	0	3
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.87	1.00	20	743	0	0	0	0	3
2L2K_A	-	0.87	0.76	1.00	13	336	0	0	0	0	4
2L3C_B	-	0.84	0.71	1.00	10	229	0	0	0	0	4
2L3E_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	228	1	0	0	1	0
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.90	1.00	27	958	0	0	0	0	3
2L5Z_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	102	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.61	0.69	11	512	5	1	4	0	7
2LDL_A	-	0.81	0.67	1.00	6	134	0	0	0	0	3
2LDT_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	151	0	0	0	0	0
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.56	0.55	0.57	16	2412	13	4	8	1	13
2LWK_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	197	1	0	0	1	1
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.10	0.11	0.11	4	2009	32	2	30	0	31
2YIE_X	-	0.43	0.57	0.33	4	532	10	2	6	2	3
2YIE_Z	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	591	11	5	6	0	8
3ADB_C	-	0.84	0.82	0.87	27	1788	4	0	4	0	6
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.75	0.79	15	1108	7	0	4	3	5
3AM1_B	-	0.83	0.76	0.92	22	1442	2	0	2	0	7
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.83	0.88	29	2607	7	0	4	3	6
3J0L_7	-	0.41	0.50	0.36	5	505	10	3	6	1	5
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.62	0.89	8	475	3	0	1	2	5
3J0L_h	-	0.55	0.50	0.62	16	2114	10	2	8	0	16
3J2C_O	-	0.51	0.49	0.54	20	3950	19	1	16	2	21
3NDB_M	-	0.68	0.64	0.74	28	3676	14	2	8	4	16
3NKB_B	-	0.46	0.42	0.53	8	720	7	0	7	0	11
3NMU_E	-	0.28	0.33	0.25	1	212	6	1	2	3	2
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.50	0.35	11	4733	30	9	11	10	11
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.84	0.96	26	2727	3	0	1	2	5
3OVS_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	204	0	0	0	0	0
3P22_G	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	301	0	0	0	0	0
3R4F_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	22	884	1	0	0	1	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SIU_F	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	6	139	0	0	0	0	2
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.42	1.00	5	149	0	0	0	0	7
3U4M_B	-	0.49	0.55	0.46	12	1250	14	3	11	0	10
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.45	0.52	15	1960	15	1	13	1	18
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.69	0.71	24	2762	11	5	5	1	11
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	8258	51	15	31	5	34
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.88	1.00	0.78	7	211	2	2	0	0	0
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	15	457	0	0	0	0	0
4FNJ_A	-	0.81	0.67	1.00	8	242	0	0	0	0	4
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]