CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	Afold		RDfolder
MCC	0.801	>	0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.784 ± 0.078	>	0.709 ± 0.084
Sensitivity	0.811	>	0.663
Positive Predictive Value	0.803	>	0.762
Total TP	869	>	711
Total TN	38325	<	38474
Total FP	297	>	274
Total FP CONTRA	48	<	49
Total FP INCONS	165	<	173
Total FP COMP	84	>	52
Total FN	203	<	361
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of Afold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RDfolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RDfolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RDfolder).

^top

Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	869
Total TN	38325
Total FP	297
Total FP CONTRA	48
Total FP INCONS	165
Total FP COMP	84
Total FN	203

Total Scores
MCC	0.801
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.784 ± 0.078
Sensitivity	0.811
Positive Predictive Value	0.803
Nr of predictions	74

^top

2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2K5Z_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	175	0	0	0	0	0
2K63_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	159	0	0	0	0	0
2K66_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	80	0	0	0	0	0
2KD8_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	99	0	0	0	0	0
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	10	164	0	0	0	0	0
2KE6_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	449	1	0	0	1	0
2KEZ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	94	0	0	0	0	0
2KFC_A	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	228	8	1	7	0	8
2KGP_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	112	1	0	0	1	0
2KMJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	157	0	0	0	0	0
2KPV_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	201	0	0	0	0	1
2KU0_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	280	0	0	0	0	0
2KUR_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	19	448	0	0	0	0	0
2KUU_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	429	1	0	0	1	0
2KUV_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	19	420	0	0	0	0	0
2KUW_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	452	1	0	0	1	0
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	16	355	0	0	0	0	0
2KXM_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	141	0	0	0	0	0
2KZL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	13	507	1	0	0	1	0
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.98	1.00	0.96	23	739	1	0	1	0	0
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.98	1.00	0.96	24	766	1	0	1	0	0
2L2K_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	17	332	0	0	0	0	0
2L3C_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	225	0	0	0	0	0
2L3E_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	228	1	0	0	1	0
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	30	955	0	0	0	0	0
2L5Z_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	102	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	193	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.61	0.69	11	512	6	0	5	1	7
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LDT_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	151	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2RP0_A	-	0.76	0.71	0.83	5	110	1	0	1	0	2
2RPT_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	65	0	0	0	0	0
2WRQ_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	1143	14	0	0	14	0
2WW9_F	-	0.68	0.75	0.67	6	103	4	1	2	1	2
2WW9_D	-	0.08	0.10	0.08	1	729	16	2	9	5	9
2WW9_E	-	0.79	0.80	0.80	4	167	1	0	1	0	1
2YIE_Z	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	587	16	6	9	1	8
2YIE_X	-	0.53	0.57	0.50	4	536	8	1	3	4	3
2ZY6_A	-	0.63	0.78	0.54	7	263	6	3	3	0	2
2ZZM_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.25	0.27	0.25	4	1342	20	3	9	8	11
2ZZN_D	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.91	0.91	20	962	3	2	0	1	2
3A2K_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.50	0.44	11	1083	14	3	11	0	11
3A3A_A	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.87	1.00	26	1474	0	0	0	0	4
3ADB_C	-	0.85	0.85	0.85	28	1786	6	0	5	1	5
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.20	0.21	4	1108	17	4	11	2	16
3AM1_B	-	0.79	0.79	0.79	23	1437	6	0	6	0	6
3DW4_A	-	-0.04	0.00	0.00	0	135	7	1	4	2	6
3GCA_A	-	-0.04	0.00	0.00	0	151	9	1	6	2	7
3HAY_E	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	910	8	0	0	8	0
3HJW_D	-	0.97	1.00	0.94	16	592	3	0	1	2	0
3IAB_R	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	373	0	0	0	0	0
3ID5_D	-	0.59	0.60	0.60	3	224	6	0	2	4	2
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	19	884	0	0	0	0	4
3IWN_A	c-di-GMP-I links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.68	0.68	19	1444	9	1	8	0	9
3J0L_7	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	504	15	1	14	0	10
3J0L_1	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	473	5	0	1	4	3
3JYV_7	tRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	1088	23	4	19	0	20
3KTW_C	-	0.94	0.96	0.92	24	1754	10	0	2	8	1
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.84	1.00	21	933	0	0	0	0	4
3NKB_B	-	0.69	0.74	0.67	14	714	7	0	7	0	5
3NMU_E	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	208	10	5	3	2	3
3OVS_D	-	0.82	0.83	0.83	10	204	2	0	2	0	2
3P22_G	-	0.91	0.91	0.91	10	301	1	0	1	0	1
3R4F_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	22	884	1	0	0	1	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SIU_F	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	137	0	0	0	0	0
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.92	1.00	11	143	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.55	0.56	18	1957	15	4	10	1	15
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.38	0.43	0.38	3	212	6	5	0	1	4
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.73	0.92	11	460	3	0	1	2	4
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	1	0	0	1	0

^top

Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	711
Total TN	38474
Total FP	274
Total FP CONTRA	49
Total FP INCONS	173
Total FP COMP	52
Total FN	361

Total Scores
MCC	0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.709 ± 0.084
Sensitivity	0.663
Positive Predictive Value	0.762
Nr of predictions	74

^top

2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2K5Z_A	-	0.79	0.64	1.00	7	179	0	0	0	0	4
2K63_A	-	0.94	0.89	1.00	8	160	0	0	0	0	1
2K66_A	-	0.94	0.89	1.00	8	81	0	0	0	0	1
2KD8_A	-	0.94	0.89	1.00	8	100	0	0	0	0	1
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	10	164	0	0	0	0	0
2KE6_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	15	452	1	0	0	1	3
2KEZ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	94	0	0	0	0	0
2KFC_A	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	5	231	0	0	0	0	3
2KGP_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	112	0	0	0	0	0
2KMJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	157	0	0	0	0	0
2KPV_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	201	0	0	0	0	1
2KU0_A	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	285	7	2	5	0	12
2KUR_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.84	1.00	16	451	0	0	0	0	3
2KUU_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	15	432	1	0	0	1	3
2KUV_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.84	1.00	16	423	0	0	0	0	3
2KUW_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.89	1.00	16	454	0	0	0	0	2
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	357	0	0	0	0	2
2KXM_A	-	0.78	0.63	1.00	5	144	0	0	0	0	3
2KZL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	13	507	4	0	0	4	0
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	750	13	2	11	0	23
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	24	767	0	0	0	0	0
2L2K_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	17	332	0	0	0	0	0
2L3C_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	225	0	0	0	0	0
2L3E_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	228	1	0	0	1	0
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	30	955	0	0	0	0	0
2L5Z_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	102	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	193	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	514	14	3	11	0	18
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	0	0	0	0	0
2LDT_A	-	0.79	0.64	1.00	7	155	0	0	0	0	4
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2RP0_A	-	0.84	0.71	1.00	5	111	0	0	0	0	2
2RPT_A	-	-0.07	0.00	0.00	0	68	4	1	3	0	7
2WRQ_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	1143	13	0	0	13	0
2WW9_F	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	6	106	1	0	0	1	2
2WW9_D	-	0.31	0.10	1.00	1	740	3	0	0	3	9
2WW9_E	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	168	5	0	4	1	5
2YIE_Z	-	0.53	0.63	0.45	5	591	6	4	2	0	3
2YIE_X	-	0.57	0.57	0.57	4	537	5	0	3	2	3
2ZY6_A	-	0.66	0.78	0.58	7	264	5	3	2	0	2
2ZZM_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.15	0.20	0.13	3	1334	21	7	14	0	12
2ZZN_D	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.95	0.91	21	961	2	2	0	0	1
3A2K_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.98	0.95	1.00	21	1087	0	0	0	0	1
3A3A_A	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.50	0.71	15	1479	6	0	6	0	15
3ADB_C	-	0.48	0.45	0.54	15	1791	13	1	12	0	18
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.53	0.55	0.52	11	1106	12	1	9	2	9
3AM1_B	-	0.52	0.52	0.54	15	1438	13	4	9	0	14
3DW4_A	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	136	4	1	3	0	6
3GCA_A	-	0.84	0.71	1.00	5	153	0	0	0	0	2
3HAY_E	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	910	7	0	0	7	0
3HJW_D	-	0.90	0.88	0.93	14	594	3	0	1	2	2
3IAB_R	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	373	4	0	0	4	0
3ID5_D	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	223	6	3	3	0	5
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	19	884	0	0	0	0	4
3IWN_A	c-di-GMP-I links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1462	10	1	9	0	28
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	514	5	1	4	0	10
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.62	0.89	8	475	3	0	1	2	5
3JYV_7	tRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	1091	20	4	16	0	20
3KTW_C	-	0.11	0.12	0.13	3	1757	23	3	17	3	22
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.84	1.00	21	933	0	0	0	0	4
3NKB_B	-	0.43	0.42	0.47	8	718	9	2	7	0	11
3NMU_E	-	0.57	0.33	1.00	1	215	3	0	0	3	2
3OVS_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	204	0	0	0	0	0
3P22_G	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	302	0	0	0	0	1
3R4F_A	-	0.78	0.73	0.84	16	887	4	2	1	1	6
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SIU_F	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	6	139	0	0	0	0	2
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.92	1.00	11	143	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.29	0.27	0.33	9	1962	18	2	16	0	24
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.75	0.57	1.00	4	216	0	0	0	0	3
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.40	0.60	6	462	4	0	4	0	9
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]