CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAalifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAalifold(seed)
MCC 0.675 > 0.644
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.782 ± 0.114 > 0.648 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.714 > 0.491
Positive Predictive Value 0.642 < 0.850
Total TP 445 > 306
Total TN 77600 < 77933
Total FP 333 > 74
Total FP CONTRA 106 > 23
Total FP INCONS 142 > 31
Total FP COMP 85 > 20
Total FN 178 < 317
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAalifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAalifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 445
Total TN 77600
Total FP 333
Total FP CONTRA 106
Total FP INCONS 142
Total FP COMP 85
Total FN 178
Total Scores
MCC 0.675
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.782 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.714
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 0.98 1.00 0.96 23 739 1 0 1 0 0
2L1F_B 0.98 1.00 0.96 24 766 1 0 1 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 97 47 37 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 35 10 2 23 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 306
Total TN 77933
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 317
Total Scores
MCC 0.644
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.491
Positive Predictive Value 0.850
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.54 0.30 1.00 3 171 0 0 0 0 7
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 454 2 0 1 1 3
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_A 0.68 0.61 0.78 14 745 4 0 4 0 9
2L1F_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 772 5 0 5 0 10
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A3A_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 1481 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.71 0.65 0.79 15 884 4 2 2 0 8
3IYQ_A 0.36 0.27 0.48 14 22411 19 13 2 4 37
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.26 0.81 25 25505 8 6 0 2 70
3JYX_4 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 4749 2 0 0 2 5
3LA5_A 0.73 0.64 0.84 16 935 3 1 2 0 9
3NPB_A 0.77 0.59 1.00 22 2256 3 0 0 3 15
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3W3S_B 0.71 0.52 1.00 17 1972 2 0 0 2 16
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.