CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & CentroidAlifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna CentroidAlifold(seed)
MCC 0.753 > 0.673
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.106 > 0.593 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.761 > 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.756 < 0.865
Total TP 430 > 300
Total TN 26353 < 26575
Total FP 202 > 87
Total FP CONTRA 36 > 3
Total FP INCONS 103 > 44
Total FP COMP 63 > 40
Total FN 135 < 265
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 430
Total TN 26353
Total FP 202
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 103
Total FP COMP 63
Total FN 135
Total Scores
MCC 0.753
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.106
Sensitivity 0.761
Positive Predictive Value 0.756
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 449 2 0 1 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 448 1 0 1 0 1
2KUU_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 429 2 0 1 1 1
2KUV_A 0.94 0.95 0.95 18 420 1 0 1 0 1
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 0.93 0.94 0.94 15 355 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.44 0.53 8 513 7 0 7 0 10
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2WWQ_V 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1185 5 0 0 5 0
2XKV_B 0.56 0.64 0.50 7 1821 27 0 7 20 4
2XQD_Y 0.73 0.71 0.75 15 1109 6 0 5 1 6
2ZZM_B 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 1342 21 3 11 7 13
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3AKZ_H 0.45 0.50 0.42 10 1103 16 6 8 2 10
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3GX2_A 0.56 0.57 0.57 16 1421 13 4 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 882 3 2 1 0 5
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 3 2 0 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1089 22 4 18 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.82 0.79 0.86 19 844 3 1 2 0 5
3SD1_A 0.55 0.55 0.57 16 1505 12 4 8 0 13
3UZL_B 0.68 0.75 0.63 12 1274 13 4 3 6 4

^top



Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 300
Total TN 26575
Total FP 87
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 40
Total FN 265
Total Scores
MCC 0.673
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.865
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 450 10 0 9 1 10
2KUR_A 0.77 0.74 0.82 14 450 4 0 3 1 5
2KUU_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 431 3 0 1 2 3
2KUV_A 0.46 0.47 0.50 9 421 9 0 9 0 10
2KUW_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 453 10 0 9 1 10
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
2WRQ_Y 0.47 0.22 1.00 2 1150 4 0 0 4 7
2WWQ_V 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1198 0 0 0 0 13
2XKV_B 0.67 0.73 0.62 8 1822 22 0 5 17 3
2XQD_Y 0.48 0.24 1.00 5 1124 1 0 0 1 16
2ZZM_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1358 6 0 0 6 15
2ZZN_D 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 978 0 0 0 0 16
3A2K_C 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 1102 0 0 0 0 16
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3AKZ_H 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 1122 1 0 0 1 15
3AMU_B 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1152 1 0 0 1 14
3GX2_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 24 1425 1 0 0 1 4
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3J16_L 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1153 0 0 0 0 15
3JYV_7 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 1106 1 0 0 1 15
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3UZL_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 4 1289 2 0 0 2 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.