CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.874 > 0.818
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.883 ± 0.098 > 0.811 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.859 > 0.715
Positive Predictive Value 0.896 < 0.945
Total TP 250 > 208
Total TN 9426 < 9485
Total FP 33 > 16
Total FP CONTRA 7 > 0
Total FP INCONS 22 > 12
Total FP COMP 4 = 4
Total FN 41 < 83
P-value 2.32677072069e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 250
Total TN 9426
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 41
Total Scores
MCC 0.874
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.883 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.859
Positive Predictive Value 0.896
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 449 2 0 1 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 448 1 0 1 0 1
2KUU_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 429 2 0 1 1 1
2KUV_A 0.94 0.95 0.95 18 420 1 0 1 0 1
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.44 0.53 8 513 7 0 7 0 10
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3IVN_B 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 882 3 2 1 0 5
3RKF_A 0.82 0.79 0.86 19 844 3 1 2 0 5
3SD1_A 0.55 0.55 0.57 16 1505 12 4 8 0 13

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 208
Total TN 9485
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.818
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.811 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.715
Positive Predictive Value 0.945
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 451 1 0 0 1 2
2KUR_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 450 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 431 1 0 0 1 2
2KUV_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 422 0 0 0 0 2
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 1 0 0 1 2
2L1F_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 774 0 0 0 0 7
2L1F_A 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 747 0 0 0 0 7
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.