CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.757 > 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.766 ± 0.103 > 0.391 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.765 > 0.350
Positive Predictive Value 0.760 > 0.739
Total TP 440 > 201
Total TN 26517 < 26824
Total FP 202 > 84
Total FP CONTRA 36 > 11
Total FP INCONS 103 > 60
Total FP COMP 63 > 13
Total FN 135 < 374
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 440
Total TN 26517
Total FP 202
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 103
Total FP COMP 63
Total FN 135
Total Scores
MCC 0.757
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.766 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.765
Positive Predictive Value 0.760
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 449 2 0 1 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 448 1 0 1 0 1
2KUU_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 429 2 0 1 1 1
2KUV_A 0.94 0.95 0.95 18 420 1 0 1 0 1
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 0.93 0.94 0.94 15 355 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.44 0.53 8 513 7 0 7 0 10
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2WWQ_V 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1185 5 0 0 5 0
2XKV_B 0.56 0.64 0.50 7 1821 27 0 7 20 4
2XQD_Y 0.73 0.71 0.75 15 1109 6 0 5 1 6
2ZZM_B 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 1342 21 3 11 7 13
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3AKZ_H 0.45 0.50 0.42 10 1103 16 6 8 2 10
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3GX2_A 0.56 0.57 0.57 16 1421 13 4 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 882 3 2 1 0 5
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 3 2 0 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1089 22 4 18 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.82 0.79 0.86 19 844 3 1 2 0 5
3SD1_A 0.55 0.55 0.57 16 1505 12 4 8 0 13
3UZL_B 0.68 0.75 0.63 12 1274 13 4 3 6 4

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 201
Total TN 26824
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 374
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.391 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.350
Positive Predictive Value 0.739
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 166 0 0 0 0 2
2KE6_A 0.85 0.78 0.93 14 452 2 0 1 1 4
2KUR_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 451 1 0 1 0 4
2KUU_A 0.85 0.78 0.93 14 432 2 0 1 1 4
2KUV_A 0.85 0.79 0.94 15 423 1 0 1 0 4
2KUW_A 0.75 0.67 0.86 12 456 3 0 2 1 6
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 370 1 0 1 0 16
2L1F_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 769 2 0 2 0 4
2L1F_A 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 742 3 0 3 0 5
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.64 9 343 6 0 5 1 9
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1150 3 1 1 1 9
2WWQ_V -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1199 6 0 5 1 19
2XKV_B 0.38 0.36 0.40 4 1825 8 4 2 2 7
2XQD_Y -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 5 0 5 0 21
2ZZM_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1358 4 0 0 4 15
2ZZN_D 0.38 0.18 0.80 4 979 1 1 0 0 18
3A2K_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1106 2 0 2 0 22
3A3A_A 0.53 0.37 0.79 11 1486 3 0 3 0 19
3AKZ_H -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 2 0 2 0 20
3AMU_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1155 2 0 2 0 19
3GX2_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1442 1 0 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 886 1 1 0 0 7
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1158 1 0 1 0 21
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1108 4 0 3 1 20
3LA5_A 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 937 0 0 0 0 8
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1287 6 3 3 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.