CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.648 > 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.625 ± 0.138 > 0.594 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.563 < 0.680
Positive Predictive Value 0.754 > 0.619
Total TP 153 < 185
Total TN 26027 > 25931
Total FP 71 < 168
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 39
Total FP INCONS 35 < 75
Total FP COMP 21 < 54
Total FN 119 > 87
P-value 0.00868291460752

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 153
Total TN 26027
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 119
Total Scores
MCC 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.625 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.563
Positive Predictive Value 0.754
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1202 2 1 0 1 5
3J2L_3 0.57 0.50 0.65 17 2994 11 2 7 2 17
3J3D_C 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 950 3 3 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.14 0.13 0.17 2 2730 10 3 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.81 0.74 0.89 25 2713 5 0 3 2 9
3J3F_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 9 4743 11 5 4 2 10
3J3F_7 0.79 0.72 0.87 26 2904 6 1 3 2 10
3J3V_B 0.53 0.41 0.69 11 2640 6 0 5 1 16
3ZEX_D 0.70 0.54 0.90 19 2775 3 0 2 1 16
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 14 0 4 10 2
4FRG_B 0.54 0.29 1.00 7 1195 0 0 0 0 17

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 185
Total TN 25931
Total FP 168
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.594 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.680
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 15 1 9 5 8
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 2726 22 4 10 8 13
3J3E_7 0.61 0.59 0.65 20 2710 13 2 9 2 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 37 12 11 14 10
3J3F_7 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 2896 9 1 6 2 5
3J3V_B 0.72 0.74 0.71 20 2628 16 1 7 8 7
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2763 8 0 3 5 5
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.