CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) MCFold
MCC 0.660 > 0.477
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.153 > 0.448 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.580 > 0.543
Positive Predictive Value 0.759 > 0.429
Total TP 142 > 133
Total TN 23387 > 23264
Total FP 65 < 234
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 56
Total FP INCONS 30 < 121
Total FP COMP 20 < 57
Total FN 103 < 112
P-value 1.16841705202e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 23387
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.153
Sensitivity 0.580
Positive Predictive Value 0.759
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1202 2 1 0 1 5
3J2L_3 0.57 0.50 0.65 17 2994 11 2 7 2 17
3J3D_C 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 950 3 3 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.14 0.13 0.17 2 2730 10 3 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.81 0.74 0.89 25 2713 5 0 3 2 9
3J3F_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 9 4743 11 5 4 2 10
3J3F_7 0.79 0.72 0.87 26 2904 6 1 3 2 10
3ZEX_D 0.70 0.54 0.90 19 2775 3 0 2 1 16
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 14 0 4 10 2
4FRG_B 0.54 0.29 1.00 7 1195 0 0 0 0 17

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 23264
Total FP 234
Total FP CONTRA 56
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 57
Total FN 112
Total Scores
MCC 0.477
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.448 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.543
Positive Predictive Value 0.429
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.66 0.71 0.63 15 1195 11 3 6 2 6
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 15 1 8 6 7
3J3D_C 0.54 0.63 0.48 12 943 13 4 9 0 7
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3J3E_7 0.55 0.56 0.54 19 2706 23 1 15 7 15
3J3F_8 0.14 0.21 0.10 4 4720 51 17 20 14 15
3J3F_7 0.88 0.89 0.86 32 2897 9 1 4 4 4
3ZEX_D 0.23 0.26 0.23 9 2756 33 6 25 2 26
3ZND_W 0.23 0.38 0.15 3 1171 26 9 8 9 5
4FRG_B 0.35 0.38 0.35 9 1176 17 3 14 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.