CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.648 > 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.625 ± 0.138 > 0.486 ± 0.175
Sensitivity 0.563 > 0.489
Positive Predictive Value 0.754 > 0.462
Total TP 153 > 133
Total TN 26027 > 25942
Total FP 71 < 209
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 37
Total FP INCONS 35 < 118
Total FP COMP 21 < 54
Total FN 119 < 139
P-value 1.66062906821e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 153
Total TN 26027
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 119
Total Scores
MCC 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.625 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.563
Positive Predictive Value 0.754
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1202 2 1 0 1 5
3J2L_3 0.57 0.50 0.65 17 2994 11 2 7 2 17
3J3D_C 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 950 3 3 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.14 0.13 0.17 2 2730 10 3 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.81 0.74 0.89 25 2713 5 0 3 2 9
3J3F_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 9 4743 11 5 4 2 10
3J3F_7 0.79 0.72 0.87 26 2904 6 1 3 2 10
3J3V_B 0.53 0.41 0.69 11 2640 6 0 5 1 16
3ZEX_D 0.70 0.54 0.90 19 2775 3 0 2 1 16
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 14 0 4 10 2
4FRG_B 0.54 0.29 1.00 7 1195 0 0 0 0 17

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 25942
Total FP 209
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 118
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 139
Total Scores
MCC 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.486 ± 0.175
Sensitivity 0.489
Positive Predictive Value 0.462
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.