CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold Alterna
MCC 0.673 > 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.199 < 0.689 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.690 = 0.690
Positive Predictive Value 0.674 > 0.665
Total TP 149 = 149
Total TN 8049 > 8046
Total FP 88 < 96
Total FP CONTRA 22 = 22
Total FP INCONS 50 < 53
Total FP COMP 16 < 21
Total FN 67 = 67
P-value 0.00148397846487

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Alterna).

  2. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Alterna).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Alterna).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 8049
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 67
Total Scores
MCC 0.673
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.690
Positive Predictive Value 0.674
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 9 1 3 5 3
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 0 0 0 0 0
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 8046
Total FP 96
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 67
Total Scores
MCC 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.689 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.690
Positive Predictive Value 0.665
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.44 0.53 8 513 7 0 7 0 10
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 9 1 3 5 3
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.63 0.62 0.67 8 472 8 0 4 4 5
3J0L_7 - 0.37 0.40 0.36 4 508 9 2 5 2 6
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 169 9 3 4 2 2
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 3 2 0 5
3SD1_A 0.55 0.55 0.57 16 1505 12 4 8 0 13
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.