CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance Plots

Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

Total counts & total scores
Individual counts

Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

Total counts & total scores
Individual counts

Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...

Overview

Metric	CRWrnafold		Mastr(20)
MCC	0.668	>	0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.692 ± 0.219	>	0.561 ± 0.289
Sensitivity	0.683	>	0.524
Positive Predictive Value	0.663	<	0.811
Total TP	112	>	86
Total TN	12205	<	12268
Total FP	83	>	26
Total FP CONTRA	18	>	5
Total FP INCONS	39	>	15
Total FP COMP	26	>	6
Total FN	52	<	78
P-value	0.0

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Mastr(20)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Mastr(20)).

Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	112
Total TN	12205
Total FP	83
Total FP CONTRA	18
Total FP INCONS	39
Total FP COMP	26
Total FN	52

Total Scores
MCC	0.668
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.692 ± 0.219
Sensitivity	0.683
Positive Predictive Value	0.663
Nr of predictions	7

2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.79	0.75	15	1137	8	0	5	3	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.66	0.61	19	1502	12	6	6	0	10
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.84	0.86	31	2727	7	0	5	2	6
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.25	0.15	5	4483	44	8	20	16	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.69	0.74	20	1410	8	4	3	1	9
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	2	0	0	2	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	485	2	0	0	2	4

Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	86
Total TN	12268
Total FP	26
Total FP CONTRA	5
Total FP INCONS	15
Total FP COMP	6
Total FN	78

Total Scores
MCC	0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.561 ± 0.289
Sensitivity	0.524
Positive Predictive Value	0.811
Nr of predictions	7

2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	15	1142	2	0	0	2	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.72	0.75	21	1505	7	4	3	0	8
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.86	0.89	32	2727	7	0	4	3	5
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	4516	0	0	0	0	20
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.34	0.53	10	1418	10	1	8	1	19
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.20	1.00	3	469	0	0	0	0	12
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.33	1.00	5	491	0	0	0	0	10

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.