CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.654 > 0.046
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.576 ± 0.170 > 0.018 ± 0.027
Sensitivity 0.516 > 0.009
Positive Predictive Value 0.838 > 0.273
Total TP 181 > 3
Total TN 27747 < 27952
Total FP 49 > 47
Total FP CONTRA 4 > 0
Total FP INCONS 31 > 8
Total FP COMP 14 < 39
Total FN 170 < 348
P-value 2.12160100812e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 181
Total TN 27747
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 170
Total Scores
MCC 0.654
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.576 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.838
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1138 7 0 4 3 4
3J20_1 0.89 0.80 1.00 16 1096 1 0 0 1 4
3J20_0 0.69 0.71 0.68 15 1197 8 1 6 1 6
3J2L_3 0.59 0.53 0.67 18 2993 11 0 9 2 16
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.21 0.67 6 5365 4 1 2 1 23
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.66 1.00 23 2773 3 0 0 3 12
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 6 1196 0 0 0 0 18

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3
Total TN 27952
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 348
Total Scores
MCC 0.046
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.018 ± 0.027
Sensitivity 0.009
Positive Predictive Value 0.273
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.