CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Afold
MCC 0.759 > 0.613
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.736 ± 0.123 > 0.644 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.654 > 0.640
Positive Predictive Value 0.885 > 0.594
Total TP 332 > 325
Total TN 63753 > 63581
Total FP 109 < 354
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 68
Total FP INCONS 22 < 154
Total FP COMP 66 < 132
Total FN 176 < 183
P-value 2.94377603181e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 332
Total TN 63753
Total FP 109
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 176
Total Scores
MCC 0.759
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.736 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.885
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.56 0.67 10 342 6 0 5 1 8
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 4 0 0 4 28
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.67 0.52 0.88 49 25480 9 7 0 2 46
3IZF_C 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2607 6 0 2 4 4
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2738 4 1 3 0 15
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_4 0.67 0.75 0.60 9 4741 9 5 1 3 3
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 23 0 3 20 3
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 2252 6 1 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 9 0 2 7 2
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 325
Total TN 63581
Total FP 354
Total FP CONTRA 68
Total FP INCONS 154
Total FP COMP 132
Total FN 183
Total Scores
MCC 0.613
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.640
Positive Predictive Value 0.594
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 35 10 2 23 2
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 29 0 6 23 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.77 0.87 27 2765 8 0 4 4 8
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.