CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.847 > 0.711
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.817 ± 0.075 > 0.727 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.714
Positive Predictive Value 0.945 > 0.717
Total TP 378 > 354
Total TN 36465 > 36371
Total FP 75 < 191
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 46
Total FP INCONS 19 < 94
Total FP COMP 53 > 51
Total FN 118 < 142
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 378
Total TN 36465
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 118
Total Scores
MCC 0.847
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.817 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.945
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.56 0.67 10 342 6 0 5 1 8
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 7 0 0 7 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 4 0 0 4 28
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3IZF_C 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2607 6 0 2 4 4
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2990 3 0 0 3 4
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 9 0 2 7 2
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 354
Total TN 36371
Total FP 191
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 94
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 142
Total Scores
MCC 0.711
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.727 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.714
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J20_1 0.71 0.75 0.68 15 1090 8 2 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.69 0.71 24 2762 11 5 5 1 11
3ZND_W 0.56 0.75 0.43 6 1177 18 5 3 10 2
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.