CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Fold
MCC 0.793 > 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.756 ± 0.085 > 0.637 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.704 > 0.696
Positive Predictive Value 0.898 > 0.640
Total TP 608 > 601
Total TN 93457 > 93195
Total FP 147 < 496
Total FP CONTRA 24 < 101
Total FP INCONS 45 < 237
Total FP COMP 78 < 158
Total FN 256 < 263
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Fold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 608
Total TN 93457
Total FP 147
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 78
Total FN 256
Total Scores
MCC 0.793
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.756 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.704
Positive Predictive Value 0.898
Nr of predictions 31

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.56 0.67 10 342 6 0 5 1 8
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 7 0 0 7 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 4 0 0 4 28
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3IZ4_A 0.67 0.52 0.88 49 25480 9 7 0 2 46
3IZF_C 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2607 6 0 2 4 4
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2990 3 0 0 3 4
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_7 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2705 12 1 7 4 6
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2738 4 1 3 0 15
3J3F_8 0.44 0.37 0.54 7 4748 8 3 3 2 12
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3V_B 0.86 0.81 0.92 22 2632 7 0 2 5 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 2252 6 1 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 9 0 2 7 2
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.31 0.64 9 5360 7 1 4 2 20
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 601
Total TN 93195
Total FP 496
Total FP CONTRA 101
Total FP INCONS 237
Total FP COMP 158
Total FN 263
Total Scores
MCC 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.696
Positive Predictive Value 0.640
Nr of predictions 31

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 2010 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 8 0 5 3 4
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3J3D_C 0.47 0.53 0.43 10 945 13 5 8 0 9
3J3E_7 0.59 0.59 0.61 20 2708 15 2 11 2 14
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 34 5 18 11 15
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 41 12 12 17 11
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3V_B 0.74 0.78 0.70 21 2626 17 2 7 8 6
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3O58_2 0.86 0.87 0.84 27 2722 12 0 5 7 4
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.34 0.23 10 5330 46 9 25 12 19
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 8 0 2 6 5
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10
4FRG_B 0.22 0.25 0.23 6 1176 20 7 13 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.