CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) IPknot
MCC 0.812 > 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.761 ± 0.117 > 0.617 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.745 > 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.890 > 0.649
Total TP 379 > 324
Total TN 45530 > 45457
Total FP 92 < 241
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 52
Total FP INCONS 33 < 123
Total FP COMP 45 < 66
Total FN 130 < 185
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 379
Total TN 45530
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 130
Total Scores
MCC 0.812
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.761 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.745
Positive Predictive Value 0.890
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2990 3 0 0 3 4
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2738 4 1 3 0 15
3J3E_7 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2705 12 1 7 4 6
3J3F_8 0.44 0.37 0.54 7 4748 8 3 3 2 12
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3V_B 0.86 0.81 0.92 22 2632 7 0 2 5 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.31 0.64 9 5360 7 1 4 2 20
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 324
Total TN 45457
Total FP 241
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 123
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 185
Total Scores
MCC 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.649
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.82 0.82 0.82 28 2986 10 0 6 4 6
3J3D_C 0.52 0.53 0.53 10 949 9 3 6 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2723 25 5 14 6 15
3J3E_7 0.60 0.56 0.66 19 2712 11 1 9 1 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 40 11 12 17 10
3J3F_7 0.81 0.83 0.79 30 2896 10 1 7 2 6
3J3V_B 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 2628 16 4 9 3 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.80 0.82 28 2762 10 0 6 4 7
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.