CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.799 > 0.625
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.748 ± 0.117 > 0.609 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.721 > 0.611
Positive Predictive Value 0.890 > 0.649
Total TP 365 > 309
Total TN 39918 > 39852
Total FP 88 < 223
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 46
Total FP INCONS 32 < 121
Total FP COMP 43 < 56
Total FN 141 < 197
P-value 5.02343278931e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 365
Total TN 39918
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 141
Total Scores
MCC 0.799
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.748 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.721
Positive Predictive Value 0.890
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.56 0.67 10 342 6 0 5 1 8
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 4 0 0 4 28
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2990 3 0 0 3 4
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_7 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2705 12 1 7 4 6
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2738 4 1 3 0 15
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3F_8 0.44 0.37 0.54 7 4748 8 3 3 2 12
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 309
Total TN 39852
Total FP 223
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 56
Total FN 197
Total Scores
MCC 0.625
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.611
Positive Predictive Value 0.649
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.79 0.82 27 2987 10 0 6 4 7
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_7 0.77 0.76 0.79 26 2708 11 1 6 4 8
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2720 22 8 14 0 15
3J3F_7 0.52 0.42 0.65 15 2911 9 0 8 1 21
3J3F_8 0.45 0.53 0.38 10 4735 30 7 9 14 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 8 0 2 6 6
3ZND_W 0.58 0.75 0.46 6 1178 17 4 3 10 2
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.