CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.798 > 0.559
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.738 ± 0.134 > 0.566 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.732 > 0.561
Positive Predictive Value 0.874 > 0.566
Total TP 320 > 245
Total TN 42034 > 41967
Total FP 89 < 266
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 63
Total FP INCONS 32 < 125
Total FP COMP 43 < 78
Total FN 117 < 192
P-value 3.05041766982e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 320
Total TN 42034
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 117
Total Scores
MCC 0.798
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.738 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.732
Positive Predictive Value 0.874
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2990 3 0 0 3 4
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2738 4 1 3 0 15
3J3E_7 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2705 12 1 7 4 6
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3F_8 0.44 0.37 0.54 7 4748 8 3 3 2 12
3J3V_B 0.86 0.81 0.92 22 2632 7 0 2 5 5
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.31 0.64 9 5360 7 1 4 2 20
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 245
Total TN 41967
Total FP 266
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 125
Total FP COMP 78
Total FN 192
Total Scores
MCC 0.559
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.561
Positive Predictive Value 0.566
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 30 6 12 12 15
3J3E_7 0.61 0.56 0.68 19 2713 10 1 8 1 15
3J3F_7 0.21 0.22 0.22 8 2898 28 3 25 0 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.32 9 4733 38 10 9 19 10
3J3V_B 0.60 0.59 0.62 16 2630 14 2 8 4 11
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 26 2770 4 0 0 4 9
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
3ZND_W 0.26 0.38 0.19 3 1175 22 7 6 9 5
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.