CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.808 > 0.658
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.071 > 0.651 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.728 > 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.901 > 0.646
Total TP 741 > 690
Total TN 107123 > 106877
Total FP 197 < 599
Total FP CONTRA 32 < 103
Total FP INCONS 49 < 275
Total FP COMP 116 < 221
Total FN 277 < 328
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 741
Total TN 107123
Total FP 197
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 116
Total FN 277
Total Scores
MCC 0.808
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.728
Positive Predictive Value 0.901
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.56 0.67 10 342 6 0 5 1 8
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 7 0 0 7 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 4 0 0 4 28
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3GX2_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 24 1425 1 0 0 1 4
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.67 0.52 0.88 49 25480 9 7 0 2 46
3IZF_C 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2607 6 0 2 4 4
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2990 3 0 0 3 4
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2738 4 1 3 0 15
3J3E_7 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2705 12 1 7 4 6
3J3F_8 0.44 0.37 0.54 7 4748 8 3 3 2 12
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3V_B 0.86 0.81 0.92 22 2632 7 0 2 5 5
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 23 0 3 20 3
3JYX_4 0.67 0.75 0.60 9 4741 9 5 1 3 3
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 2252 6 1 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 9 0 2 7 2
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.31 0.64 9 5360 7 1 4 2 20
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 690
Total TN 106877
Total FP 599
Total FP CONTRA 103
Total FP INCONS 275
Total FP COMP 221
Total FN 328
Total Scores
MCC 0.658
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.651 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.646
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.58 0.64 0.54 7 1822 23 0 6 17 4
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3GX2_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1423 5 2 2 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.60 0.57 57 25436 53 12 31 10 38
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 9 0 5 4 3
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 6 0 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3J3D_C 0.33 0.37 0.32 7 946 15 3 12 0 12
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.13 3 2718 32 6 15 11 12
3J3E_7 0.58 0.59 0.59 20 2707 16 2 12 2 14
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 44 12 12 20 11
3J3F_7 0.86 0.86 0.86 31 2898 6 1 4 1 5
3J3V_B 0.75 0.74 0.77 20 2630 16 0 6 10 7
3JYV_7 0.24 0.25 0.25 5 1091 16 7 8 1 15
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 27 0 4 23 3
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 31 10 2 19 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.85 0.78 0.94 29 2247 6 0 2 4 8
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 34 5 15 14 11
3O58_2 0.87 0.87 0.87 27 2723 12 0 4 8 4
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 6 0 2 4 6
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
3ZND_W 0.25 0.38 0.18 3 1174 22 8 6 8 5
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.