CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Vsfold4
MCC 0.817 > 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.070 > 0.556 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.740 > 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.906 > 0.537
Total TP 732 > 519
Total TN 101763 > 101605
Total FP 190 < 578
Total FP CONTRA 31 < 126
Total FP INCONS 45 < 321
Total FP COMP 114 < 131
Total FN 257 < 470
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 732
Total TN 101763
Total FP 190
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 114
Total FN 257
Total Scores
MCC 0.817
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.740
Positive Predictive Value 0.906
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.56 0.67 10 342 6 0 5 1 8
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 7 0 0 7 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 4 0 0 4 28
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3GX2_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 24 1425 1 0 0 1 4
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.67 0.52 0.88 49 25480 9 7 0 2 46
3IZF_C 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2607 6 0 2 4 4
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2990 3 0 0 3 4
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2738 4 1 3 0 15
3J3E_7 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2705 12 1 7 4 6
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3F_8 0.44 0.37 0.54 7 4748 8 3 3 2 12
3J3V_B 0.86 0.81 0.92 22 2632 7 0 2 5 5
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_4 0.67 0.75 0.60 9 4741 9 5 1 3 3
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 23 0 3 20 3
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 2252 6 1 1 4 13
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 9 0 2 7 2
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 519
Total TN 101605
Total FP 578
Total FP CONTRA 126
Total FP INCONS 321
Total FP COMP 131
Total FN 470
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.537
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 341 1 0 0 1 2
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 13 0 0 13 1
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1808 27 13 14 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1110 1 0 0 1 2
2XXA_G -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 2016 29 1 28 0 35
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3AMU_B 0.73 0.74 0.74 14 1138 8 0 5 3 5
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 0 9 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.39 0.39 0.39 37 25441 63 15 43 5 58
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 6 0 4 2 6
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 12 3 6 3 10
3J3D_C 0.48 0.53 0.45 10 946 12 4 8 0 9
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.09 2 2720 32 9 11 12 13
3J3E_7 0.61 0.56 0.68 19 2713 10 1 8 1 15
3J3F_7 0.25 0.25 0.26 9 2900 25 6 19 0 27
3J3F_8 0.35 0.42 0.30 8 4734 30 11 8 11 11
3J3V_B 0.19 0.19 0.22 5 2633 24 3 15 6 22
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3JYX_4 0.19 0.25 0.15 3 4736 33 9 8 16 9
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 16 5 1 10 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.66 0.59 0.73 22 2248 10 0 8 2 15
3O58_2 0.53 0.52 0.55 16 2725 16 3 10 3 15
3O58_3 0.12 0.14 0.11 3 4737 35 8 16 11 19
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.23 0.24 0.24 7 1504 22 5 17 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.66 0.63 0.71 22 2765 10 4 5 1 13
3ZND_W 0.58 0.75 0.46 6 1178 17 4 3 10 2
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.