CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.678 > 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.202 < 0.646 ± 0.263
Sensitivity 0.473 < 0.655
Positive Predictive Value 0.980 > 0.649
Total TP 96 < 133
Total TN 13963 > 13856
Total FP 7 < 98
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 21
Total FP INCONS 1 < 51
Total FP COMP 5 < 26
Total FN 107 > 70
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 96
Total TN 13963
Total FP 7
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.202
Sensitivity 0.473
Positive Predictive Value 0.980
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3AMU_B 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1152 1 0 0 1 14
3J16_L 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1153 0 0 0 0 15
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_3 0.66 0.43 1.00 16 2747 0 0 0 0 21
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 13856
Total FP 98
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.263
Sensitivity 0.655
Positive Predictive Value 0.649
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 0 0 0 0 0
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 7 0 5 2 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.