CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Fold
MCC 0.736 > 0.659
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.064 < 0.700 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.608 < 0.688
Positive Predictive Value 0.893 > 0.633
Total TP 1017 < 1152
Total TN 553459 > 552778
Total FP 270 < 918
Total FP CONTRA 49 < 183
Total FP INCONS 73 < 485
Total FP COMP 148 < 250
Total FN 657 > 522
P-value 8.81311508309e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1017
Total TN 553459
Total FP 270
Total FP CONTRA 49
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 148
Total FN 657
Total Scores
MCC 0.736
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.608
Positive Predictive Value 0.893
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 0.77 0.74 0.82 14 450 4 0 3 1 5
2KUU_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 431 3 0 1 2 3
2KUV_A 0.46 0.47 0.50 9 421 9 0 9 0 10
2KUW_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 453 10 0 9 1 10
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
2WWQ_V 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1198 0 0 0 0 13
2XKV_B 0.67 0.73 0.62 8 1822 22 0 5 17 3
2XQD_Y 0.48 0.24 1.00 5 1124 1 0 0 1 16
2XXA_G 0.83 0.74 0.93 26 2017 4 0 2 2 9
3AKZ_H 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 1122 1 0 0 1 15
3AMU_B 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1152 1 0 0 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.56 0.55 0.57 28 22391 30 19 2 9 23
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.43 0.77 41 25483 17 12 0 5 54
3IZF_C 0.67 0.46 1.00 16 2624 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1153 0 0 0 0 15
3J20_0 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1213 0 0 0 0 15
3J20_2 0.88 0.85 0.92 349 421988 102 9 22 71 63
3J20_1 0.54 0.30 1.00 6 1106 0 0 0 0 14
3J2L_3 0.66 0.44 1.00 15 3005 2 0 0 2 19
3J3D_C 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 962 0 0 0 0 13
3J3E_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2723 2 0 1 1 17
3J3E_8 0.39 0.20 0.75 3 2738 1 1 0 0 12
3J3F_8 0.62 0.47 0.82 9 4750 4 2 0 2 10
3J3F_7 0.68 0.47 1.00 17 2917 1 0 0 1 19
3J3V_B 0.61 0.44 0.86 12 2642 7 0 2 5 15
3NPB_A 0.79 0.65 0.96 24 2253 5 0 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3O58_2 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2738 0 0 0 0 15
3PDR_A 0.93 0.88 0.98 44 4795 3 0 1 2 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3UZL_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 4 1289 2 0 0 2 12
3W1K_J 0.86 0.81 0.93 25 1651 2 1 1 0 6
3W3S_B 0.80 0.70 0.92 23 1964 4 0 2 2 10
3ZEX_C 0.56 0.34 0.91 10 5363 3 1 0 2 19
3ZEX_D 0.65 0.43 1.00 15 2781 3 0 0 3 20
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 6 0 2 4 8
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4A1C_3 0.66 0.43 1.00 16 2747 0 0 0 0 21
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7
4FRN_A 0.80 0.71 0.91 20 1826 2 1 1 0 8
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1152
Total TN 552778
Total FP 918
Total FP CONTRA 183
Total FP INCONS 485
Total FP COMP 250
Total FN 522
Total Scores
MCC 0.659
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.700 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.688
Positive Predictive Value 0.633
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 0.91 0.92 0.92 22 767 2 0 2 0 2
2L1F_A 0.91 0.91 0.91 21 740 2 0 2 0 2
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2WWQ_V 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1186 3 0 0 3 1
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 2010 1 0 0 1 0
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 2 0 0 2 0
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22345 95 40 38 17 34
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 8 0 5 3 4
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 0 5 0 5
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_2 0.55 0.58 0.53 239 421918 270 31 180 59 173
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3J3D_C 0.47 0.53 0.43 10 945 13 5 8 0 9
3J3E_7 0.59 0.59 0.61 20 2708 15 2 11 2 14
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 34 5 18 11 15
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 41 12 12 17 11
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3V_B 0.74 0.78 0.70 21 2626 17 2 7 8 6
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3O58_2 0.86 0.87 0.84 27 2722 12 0 5 7 4
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3UZL_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1277 8 0 0 8 0
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.34 0.23 10 5330 46 9 25 12 19
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 8 0 2 6 5
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10
4FRG_B 0.22 0.25 0.23 6 1176 20 7 13 0 18
4FRN_A 0.46 0.46 0.46 13 1820 15 7 8 0 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.