CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) IPknot
MCC 0.764 > 0.717
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.631 ± 0.084 < 0.676 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.627 < 0.704
Positive Predictive Value 0.932 > 0.731
Total TP 685 < 769
Total TN 477166 > 476849
Total FP 151 < 419
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 73
Total FP INCONS 33 < 210
Total FP COMP 101 < 136
Total FN 407 > 323
P-value 7.57333037898e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 685
Total TN 477166
Total FP 151
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 101
Total FN 407
Total Scores
MCC 0.764
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.631 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.627
Positive Predictive Value 0.932
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3AMU_B 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1152 1 0 0 1 14
3J16_L 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1153 0 0 0 0 15
3J20_1 0.54 0.30 1.00 6 1106 0 0 0 0 14
3J20_2 0.88 0.85 0.92 349 421988 102 9 22 71 63
3J20_0 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1213 0 0 0 0 15
3J2L_3 0.66 0.44 1.00 15 3005 2 0 0 2 19
3J3D_C 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 962 0 0 0 0 13
3J3E_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2723 2 0 1 1 17
3J3E_8 0.39 0.20 0.75 3 2738 1 1 0 0 12
3J3F_7 0.68 0.47 1.00 17 2917 1 0 0 1 19
3J3F_8 0.62 0.47 0.82 9 4750 4 2 0 2 10
3J3V_B 0.61 0.44 0.86 12 2642 7 0 2 5 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3UZL_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 4 1289 2 0 0 2 12
3W1K_J 0.86 0.81 0.93 25 1651 2 1 1 0 6
3W3S_B 0.80 0.70 0.92 23 1964 4 0 2 2 10
3ZEX_D 0.65 0.43 1.00 15 2781 3 0 0 3 20
3ZEX_C 0.56 0.34 0.91 10 5363 3 1 0 2 19
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 6 0 2 4 8
4A1C_3 0.66 0.43 1.00 16 2747 0 0 0 0 21
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7
4FRN_A 0.80 0.71 0.91 20 1826 2 1 1 0 8
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 769
Total TN 476849
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 210
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 323
Total Scores
MCC 0.717
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.676 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.704
Positive Predictive Value 0.731
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_2 0.75 0.74 0.76 305 421966 159 17 80 62 107
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.82 0.82 0.82 28 2986 10 0 6 4 6
3J3D_C 0.52 0.53 0.53 10 949 9 3 6 0 9
3J3E_7 0.60 0.56 0.66 19 2712 11 1 9 1 15
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2723 25 5 14 6 15
3J3F_7 0.81 0.83 0.79 30 2896 10 1 7 2 6
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 40 11 12 17 10
3J3V_B 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 2628 16 4 9 3 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.80 0.82 28 2762 10 0 6 4 7
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4JF2_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 1058 1 1 0 0 1

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.