CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.643 > 0.340
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.112 > 0.356 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.441 > 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.944 > 0.283
Total TP 203 > 198
Total TN 39969 > 39484
Total FP 38 < 582
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 174
Total FP INCONS 7 < 328
Total FP COMP 26 < 80
Total FN 257 < 262
P-value 3.45076534967e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 203
Total TN 39969
Total FP 38
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 7
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 257
Total Scores
MCC 0.643
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.441
Positive Predictive Value 0.944
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3J16_L 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1153 0 0 0 0 15
3J20_1 0.54 0.30 1.00 6 1106 0 0 0 0 14
3J2L_3 0.66 0.44 1.00 15 3005 2 0 0 2 19
3J3D_C 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 962 0 0 0 0 13
3J3E_8 0.39 0.20 0.75 3 2738 1 1 0 0 12
3J3E_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2723 2 0 1 1 17
3J3F_8 0.62 0.47 0.82 9 4750 4 2 0 2 10
3J3F_7 0.68 0.47 1.00 17 2917 1 0 0 1 19
3J3V_B 0.61 0.44 0.86 12 2642 7 0 2 5 15
3UZL_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 4 1289 2 0 0 2 12
3W3S_B 0.80 0.70 0.92 23 1964 4 0 2 2 10
3ZEX_D 0.65 0.43 1.00 15 2781 3 0 0 3 20
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 6 0 2 4 8
4A1C_3 0.66 0.43 1.00 16 2747 0 0 0 0 21
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 198
Total TN 39484
Total FP 582
Total FP CONTRA 174
Total FP INCONS 328
Total FP COMP 80
Total FN 262
Total Scores
MCC 0.340
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.356 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.283
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
3J16_L 0.43 0.52 0.37 11 1129 19 8 11 0 10
3J20_1 0.42 0.50 0.37 10 1085 20 5 12 3 10
3J2L_3 0.13 0.18 0.12 6 2969 46 14 31 1 28
3J3D_C 0.76 0.95 0.62 18 939 11 9 2 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2707 47 11 24 12 15
3J3E_7 0.44 0.53 0.38 18 2693 31 10 20 1 16
3J3F_8 0.30 0.47 0.19 9 4714 57 21 17 19 10
3J3F_7 0.20 0.25 0.18 9 2883 43 10 32 1 27
3J3V_B 0.28 0.37 0.23 10 2612 38 13 21 4 17
3UZL_B 0.41 0.56 0.31 9 1264 25 10 10 5 7
3W3S_B 0.18 0.21 0.18 7 1949 34 2 31 1 26
3ZEX_D 0.30 0.37 0.27 13 2747 36 10 26 0 22
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 31 8 8 15 5
4A1C_3 0.58 0.68 0.51 25 2714 24 9 15 0 12
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4
4JF2_A 0.55 0.67 0.47 16 1048 19 9 9 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.