CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.730 > 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.684 ± 0.115 > 0.680 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.631 > 0.593
Positive Predictive Value 0.852 > 0.789
Total TP 287 > 270
Total TN 39178 > 39173
Total FP 68 < 117
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 27
Total FP INCONS 41 < 45
Total FP COMP 18 < 45
Total FN 168 < 185
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 287
Total TN 39178
Total FP 68
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 168
Total Scores
MCC 0.730
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.684 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.631
Positive Predictive Value 0.852
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 450 10 0 9 1 10
2KUR_A 0.77 0.74 0.82 14 450 4 0 3 1 5
2KUU_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 431 3 0 1 2 3
2KUV_A 0.46 0.47 0.50 9 421 9 0 9 0 10
2KUW_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 453 10 0 9 1 10
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.39 0.20 0.75 3 2738 1 1 0 0 12
3J3F_8 0.62 0.47 0.82 9 4750 4 2 0 2 10
3JYX_4 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 4746 3 0 0 3 2
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3W3S_B 0.80 0.70 0.92 23 1964 4 0 2 2 10
3ZEX_C 0.56 0.34 0.91 10 5363 3 1 0 2 19
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 270
Total TN 39173
Total FP 117
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 185
Total Scores
MCC 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.680 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.593
Positive Predictive Value 0.789
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 451 1 0 0 1 2
2KUR_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 450 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 431 1 0 0 1 2
2KUV_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 422 0 0 0 0 2
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 1 0 0 1 2
2L1F_A 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 747 0 0 0 0 7
2L1F_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 774 0 0 0 0 7
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 13 6 1 6 2
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.