CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.737 > 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.110 > 0.709 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.717 > 0.690
Positive Predictive Value 0.767 > 0.689
Total TP 349 > 336
Total TN 26292 > 26259
Total FP 145 < 203
Total FP CONTRA 27 < 42
Total FP INCONS 79 < 110
Total FP COMP 39 < 51
Total FN 138 < 151
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 349
Total TN 26292
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 79
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 138
Total Scores
MCC 0.737
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.717
Positive Predictive Value 0.767
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.86 0.89 25 2412 8 0 3 5 4
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 3 0 0 3 0
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.36 0.50 4 403 5 3 1 1 7
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.31 0.28 8 2221 24 2 19 3 18
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.89 0.88 0.90 28 2109 5 0 3 2 4
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.59 0.57 0.63 12 1140 7 0 7 0 9
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 336
Total TN 26259
Total FP 203
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 151
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.709 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.690
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 14 247 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.58 0.55 0.62 16 2414 13 4 6 3 13
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 9 1 3 5 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3J0L_2 - 0.31 0.31 0.33 8 2226 23 1 15 7 18
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.93 0.88 1.00 28 2112 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 0 0 0 0 0
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 7 0 5 2 6
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.