CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Mastr(20)
MCC 0.690 > 0.610
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.082 > 0.540 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.689 > 0.475
Positive Predictive Value 0.698 < 0.790
Total TP 701 > 484
Total TN 106940 < 107332
Total FP 454 > 219
Total FP CONTRA 106 > 25
Total FP INCONS 198 > 104
Total FP COMP 150 > 90
Total FN 317 < 534
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 701
Total TN 106940
Total FP 454
Total FP CONTRA 106
Total FP INCONS 198
Total FP COMP 150
Total FN 317
Total Scores
MCC 0.690
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.689
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 27 0 6 21 3
2XQD_Y 0.83 0.81 0.85 17 1109 4 0 3 1 4
2XXA_G 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 2021 21 2 18 1 31
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3GX2_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 25 1424 1 0 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 54 25451 38 16 15 7 41
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 11 0 5 6 3
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 15 1 9 5 8
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 2726 22 4 10 8 13
3J3E_7 0.61 0.59 0.65 20 2710 13 2 9 2 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 37 12 11 14 10
3J3F_7 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 2896 9 1 6 2 5
3J3V_B 0.72 0.74 0.71 20 2628 16 1 7 8 7
3JYV_7 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 1094 2 0 0 2 3
3JYX_3 0.35 0.47 0.27 7 2352 21 14 5 2 8
3JYX_4 0.41 0.58 0.29 7 4732 25 11 6 8 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.87 0.84 0.91 31 2244 8 1 2 5 6
3O58_3 0.44 0.41 0.47 9 4745 11 1 9 1 13
3O58_2 0.95 0.94 0.97 29 2724 7 0 1 6 2
3PDR_A 0.88 0.86 0.90 43 4792 7 2 3 2 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2763 8 0 3 5 5
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.34 0.67 10 5359 6 1 4 1 19
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 484
Total TN 107332
Total FP 219
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 104
Total FP COMP 90
Total FN 534
Total Scores
MCC 0.610
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.540 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.475
Positive Predictive Value 0.790
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 341 2 0 1 1 3
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3A2K_C 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1088 3 0 3 0 5
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3GX2_A 0.46 0.39 0.55 11 1429 10 2 7 1 17
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25536 0 0 0 0 95
3IZF_C 0.91 0.91 0.91 32 2605 9 0 3 6 3
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 0.26 0.25 0.29 5 1095 12 1 11 0 15
3J2L_3 0.42 0.38 0.48 13 2993 16 2 12 2 21
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3E_7 0.84 0.85 0.83 29 2706 12 1 5 6 5
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4761 0 0 0 0 19
3J3F_7 0.89 0.89 0.89 32 2898 8 1 3 4 4
3J3V_B 0.27 0.26 0.30 7 2633 16 1 15 0 20
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 26 0 4 22 3
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.34 0.30 0.41 11 2251 18 1 15 2 26
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 12 0 2 10 2
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 7 0 2 5 3
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
3ZND_W -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1180 16 5 6 5 8
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.