CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.648 > 0.625
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.127 > 0.609 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.654 > 0.611
Positive Predictive Value 0.652 > 0.649
Total TP 331 > 309
Total TN 39820 < 39852
Total FP 243 > 223
Total FP CONTRA 56 > 46
Total FP INCONS 121 = 121
Total FP COMP 66 > 56
Total FN 175 < 197
P-value 9.88012384877e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 331
Total TN 39820
Total FP 243
Total FP CONTRA 56
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 175
Total Scores
MCC 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.652
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2XXA_G 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 2021 21 2 18 1 31
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 15 1 9 5 8
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_7 0.61 0.59 0.65 20 2710 13 2 9 2 14
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 2726 22 4 10 8 13
3J3F_7 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 2896 9 1 6 2 5
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 37 12 11 14 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2763 8 0 3 5 5
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 309
Total TN 39852
Total FP 223
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 56
Total FN 197
Total Scores
MCC 0.625
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.611
Positive Predictive Value 0.649
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.79 0.82 27 2987 10 0 6 4 7
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_7 0.77 0.76 0.79 26 2708 11 1 6 4 8
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2720 22 8 14 0 15
3J3F_7 0.52 0.42 0.65 15 2911 9 0 8 1 21
3J3F_8 0.45 0.53 0.38 10 4735 30 7 9 14 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 8 0 2 6 6
3ZND_W 0.58 0.75 0.46 6 1178 17 4 3 10 2
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.