CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.673 > 0.582
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.693 ± 0.085 > 0.624 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.670 > 0.568
Positive Predictive Value 0.683 > 0.605
Total TP 798 > 676
Total TN 127998 < 128049
Total FP 515 < 580
Total FP CONTRA 116 < 151
Total FP INCONS 255 < 291
Total FP COMP 144 > 138
Total FN 393 < 515
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 798
Total TN 127998
Total FP 515
Total FP CONTRA 116
Total FP INCONS 255
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 393
Total Scores
MCC 0.673
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.693 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.670
Positive Predictive Value 0.683
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.86 0.89 25 2412 8 0 3 5 4
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 424 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 538 6 0 6 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.36 0.50 4 403 5 3 1 1 7
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.31 0.28 8 2221 24 2 19 3 18
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.89 0.88 0.90 28 2109 5 0 3 2 4
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.59 0.57 0.63 12 1140 7 0 7 0 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J2C_O - 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 3950 6 0 0 6 4
3J2C_M - 0.60 0.60 0.60 58 39829 58 14 24 20 38
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 15 1 9 5 8
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 2726 22 4 10 8 13
3J3E_7 0.61 0.59 0.65 20 2710 13 2 9 2 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 37 12 11 14 10
3J3F_7 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 2896 9 1 6 2 5
3J3V_B 0.72 0.74 0.71 20 2628 16 1 7 8 7
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 30 1959 1 0 0 1 3
3ZEX_H - 0.27 0.37 0.21 7 3591 27 16 11 0 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 9 0 4 5 4
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.34 0.67 10 5359 6 1 4 1 19
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2763 8 0 3 5 5
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8255 51 19 30 2 34
3ZEX_G - 0.45 0.44 0.47 20 6464 32 6 17 9 25
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.61 0.57 0.67 4 214 2 0 2 0 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.80 0.71 0.91 20 1826 2 1 1 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5
4JRC_A - 0.38 0.41 0.39 7 604 11 0 11 0 10

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 676
Total TN 128049
Total FP 580
Total FP CONTRA 151
Total FP INCONS 291
Total FP COMP 138
Total FN 515
Total Scores
MCC 0.582
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.624 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.568
Positive Predictive Value 0.605
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 2412 13 1 7 5 9
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 424 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2M58_A - 0.37 0.33 0.44 4 535 5 4 1 0 8
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2119 0 0 0 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 4 0 1 3 5
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2C_O - 0.72 0.68 0.76 28 3950 13 2 7 4 13
3J2C_M - 0.46 0.49 0.44 47 39819 77 22 37 18 49
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 30 6 12 12 15
3J3E_7 0.61 0.56 0.68 19 2713 10 1 8 1 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.32 9 4733 38 10 9 19 10
3J3F_7 0.21 0.22 0.22 8 2898 28 3 25 0 28
3J3V_B 0.60 0.59 0.62 16 2630 14 2 8 4 11
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1280 9 1 4 4 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W1K_J 0.93 0.90 0.97 28 1649 1 1 0 0 3
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
3ZEX_H - 0.27 0.37 0.21 7 3592 26 16 10 0 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 914 0 0 0 0 4
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 26 2770 4 0 0 4 9
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8254 55 20 30 5 34
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6507 0 0 0 0 45
3ZND_W 0.26 0.38 0.19 3 1175 22 7 6 9 5
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 239 11 0 11 0 12
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.19 0.18 0.22 5 1825 18 6 12 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5
4JRC_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 16 606 0 0 0 0 1

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.