CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.689 > 0.657
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.085 > 0.629 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.687 > 0.595
Positive Predictive Value 0.697 < 0.732
Total TP 681 > 590
Total TN 104312 < 104483
Total FP 438 > 341
Total FP CONTRA 105 > 84
Total FP INCONS 191 > 132
Total FP COMP 142 > 125
Total FN 310 < 401
P-value 3.85233844192e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 681
Total TN 104312
Total FP 438
Total FP CONTRA 105
Total FP INCONS 191
Total FP COMP 142
Total FN 310
Total Scores
MCC 0.689
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.687
Positive Predictive Value 0.697
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 27 0 6 21 3
2XQD_Y 0.83 0.81 0.85 17 1109 4 0 3 1 4
2XXA_G 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 2021 21 2 18 1 31
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3GX2_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 25 1424 1 0 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 54 25451 38 16 15 7 41
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 11 0 5 6 3
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 15 1 9 5 8
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_7 0.61 0.59 0.65 20 2710 13 2 9 2 14
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 2726 22 4 10 8 13
3J3F_7 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 2896 9 1 6 2 5
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 37 12 11 14 10
3JYV_7 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 1094 2 0 0 2 3
3JYX_4 0.41 0.58 0.29 7 4732 25 11 6 8 5
3JYX_3 0.35 0.47 0.27 7 2352 21 14 5 2 8
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.87 0.84 0.91 31 2244 8 1 2 5 6
3O58_3 0.44 0.41 0.47 9 4745 11 1 9 1 13
3O58_2 0.95 0.94 0.97 29 2724 7 0 1 6 2
3PDR_A 0.88 0.86 0.90 43 4792 7 2 3 2 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.34 0.67 10 5359 6 1 4 1 19
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2763 8 0 3 5 5
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 590
Total TN 104483
Total FP 341
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 132
Total FP COMP 125
Total FN 401
Total Scores
MCC 0.657
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.629 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.595
Positive Predictive Value 0.732
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1831 4 1 3 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3GX2_A 0.40 0.21 0.75 6 1441 2 1 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J20_1 0.67 0.50 0.91 10 1101 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_7 0.82 0.79 0.84 27 2709 7 0 5 2 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 3 1 1 1 2
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_4 0.59 0.75 0.47 9 4737 33 9 1 23 3
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 16 0 3 13 3
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.31 0.38 9 5350 19 3 12 4 20
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.