CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Afold
MCC 0.705 > 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.768 ± 0.130 > 0.736 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.621 < 0.704
Positive Predictive Value 0.810 > 0.663
Total TP 306 < 347
Total TN 33747 > 33602
Total FP 110 < 240
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 52
Total FP INCONS 55 < 124
Total FP COMP 38 < 64
Total FN 187 > 146
P-value 1.12734318562e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Afold).

  2. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Afold).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Afold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 306
Total TN 33747
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 187
Total Scores
MCC 0.705
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.768 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.621
Positive Predictive Value 0.810
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.84 0.73 1.00 8 154 0 0 0 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2436 4 0 4 0 29
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2YIE_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 594 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_h - 0.88 0.84 0.93 27 2111 4 0 2 2 5
3J0L_7 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 512 1 0 0 1 3
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J2C_O - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3987 0 0 0 0 41
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8273 33 9 22 2 34
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 347
Total TN 33602
Total FP 240
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 124
Total FP COMP 64
Total FN 146
Total Scores
MCC 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.736 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.704
Positive Predictive Value 0.663
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 8 0 0 8 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 197 2 0 1 1 2
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 16 6 9 1 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 8 1 3 4 3
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 5 1 1 3 6
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 1 14 0 10
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J2C_O - 0.70 0.68 0.72 28 3948 18 3 8 7 13
3NMU_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 208 10 5 3 2 3
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.77 0.87 27 2765 8 0 4 4 8
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8251 55 17 36 2 34
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 1 0 0 1 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.