CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	CentroidHomfold‑LAST		Alterna
MCC	0.810	>	0.711
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.790 ± 0.122	>	0.712 ± 0.127
Sensitivity	0.719	<	0.734
Positive Predictive Value	0.922	>	0.704
Total TP	238	<	243
Total TN	12462	>	12375
Total FP	43	<	138
Total FP CONTRA	2	<	32
Total FP INCONS	18	<	70
Total FP COMP	23	<	36
Total FN	93	>	88
P-value	5.19332990918e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Alterna).
Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Alterna).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Alterna).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Alterna).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Alterna).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Alterna).

^top

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	238
Total TN	12462
Total FP	43
Total FP CONTRA	2
Total FP INCONS	18
Total FP COMP	23
Total FN	93

Total Scores
MCC	0.810
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.790 ± 0.122
Sensitivity	0.719
Positive Predictive Value	0.922
Nr of predictions	29

^top

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	17	339	2	0	1	1	1
2LA5_A	-	0.77	0.71	0.83	5	269	1	0	1	0	2
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	193	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	517	11	0	11	0	18
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LDT_A	-	0.84	0.73	1.00	8	154	0	0	0	0	3
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2RRC_A	-	0.83	0.71	1.00	5	70	0	0	0	0	2
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	82	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.23	0.06	1.00	1	905	0	0	0	0	17
2YIE_X	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	537	0	0	0	0	0
2YIE_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	594	0	0	0	0	0
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.95	0.95	18	1138	4	0	1	3	1
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.62	0.89	8	475	3	0	1	2	5
3J0L_g	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	176	0	0	0	0	2
3J0L_8	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	69	0	0	0	0	0
3J0L_a	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	408	3	1	2	0	11
3J0L_7	-	0.83	0.70	1.00	7	512	1	0	0	1	3
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.81	1.00	17	1142	0	0	0	0	4
3NMU_E	-	0.57	0.33	1.00	1	215	3	0	0	3	2
3R9X_C	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	221	2	0	0	2	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	848	0	0	0	0	6
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.66	0.90	19	1512	2	1	1	0	10
3SIU_F	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	6	139	0	0	0	0	2
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	144	0	0	0	0	2
3TRZ_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	87	1	0	0	1	0
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	112	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	103	0	0	0	0	0
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	1279	7	0	0	7	2

^top

Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	243
Total TN	12375
Total FP	138
Total FP CONTRA	32
Total FP INCONS	70
Total FP COMP	36
Total FN	88

Total Scores
MCC	0.711
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.712 ± 0.127
Sensitivity	0.734
Positive Predictive Value	0.704
Nr of predictions	29

^top

2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LA5_A	-	0.77	0.71	0.83	5	269	1	0	1	0	2
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	193	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.44	0.53	8	513	7	0	7	0	10
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LDT_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	151	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2RRC_A	-	0.83	0.71	1.00	5	70	0	0	0	0	2
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	82	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.79	0.83	0.75	15	886	8	0	5	3	3
2YIE_X	-	0.53	0.57	0.50	4	536	9	1	3	5	3
2YIE_Z	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	587	15	6	9	0	8
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.79	0.68	15	1135	10	0	7	3	4
3J0L_1	-	0.63	0.62	0.67	8	472	8	0	4	4	5
3J0L_g	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	169	9	3	4	2	2
3J0L_8	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	69	0	0	0	0	0
3J0L_a	-	0.18	0.18	0.22	2	402	8	3	4	1	9
3J0L_7	-	0.37	0.40	0.36	4	508	9	2	5	2	6
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.76	0.76	16	1138	5	3	2	0	5
3NMU_E	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	208	10	5	3	2	3
3R9X_C	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	221	2	0	0	2	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.79	0.86	19	844	3	1	2	0	5
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.55	0.57	16	1505	12	4	8	0	13
3SIU_F	-	0.69	0.75	0.67	6	136	3	0	3	0	2
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	144	0	0	0	0	2
3TRZ_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	87	2	0	0	2	0
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	112	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	103	0	0	0	0	0
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.75	0.63	12	1274	13	4	3	6	4

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]