CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.660 > 0.273
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.203 > 0.122 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.638 > 0.076
Positive Predictive Value 0.693 < 1.000
Total TP 185 > 22
Total TN 17740 < 17985
Total FP 99 > 1
Total FP CONTRA 26 > 0
Total FP INCONS 56 > 0
Total FP COMP 17 > 1
Total FN 105 < 268
P-value 1.79203144115e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Carnac(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 185
Total TN 17740
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 56
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 105
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.203
Sensitivity 0.638
Positive Predictive Value 0.693
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12
4FRN_A 0.37 0.46 0.32 13 1807 28 11 17 0 15

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 22
Total TN 17985
Total FP 1
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 268
Total Scores
MCC 0.273
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.122 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.076
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.22 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 14
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.