CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST MCFold
MCC 0.735 > 0.574
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.084 > 0.596 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.696 > 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.785 > 0.556
Total TP 672 > 586
Total TN 62720 > 62522
Total FP 280 < 628
Total FP CONTRA 53 < 110
Total FP INCONS 131 < 358
Total FP COMP 96 < 160
Total FN 294 < 380
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 672
Total TN 62720
Total FP 280
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 131
Total FP COMP 96
Total FN 294
Total Scores
MCC 0.735
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.696
Positive Predictive Value 0.785
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.84 0.73 1.00 8 154 0 0 0 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2436 4 0 4 0 29
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 424 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 539 5 0 5 0 12
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.23 0.06 1.00 1 905 0 0 0 0 17
2YIE_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 594 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 0 0 0 0 0
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.88 0.84 0.93 27 2111 4 0 2 2 5
3J0L_7 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 512 1 0 0 1 3
3J0L_2 - 0.55 0.31 1.00 8 2242 0 0 0 0 18
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J2L_3 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2986 8 0 2 6 2
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3J3E_7 0.85 0.85 0.85 29 2707 9 0 5 4 5
3J3F_7 0.79 0.81 0.78 29 2897 10 1 7 2 7
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 36 11 13 12 10
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
3ZEX_G - 0.97 0.93 1.00 42 6465 10 0 0 10 3
3ZND_W 0.75 0.75 0.75 6 1183 13 0 2 11 2
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12
4FRN_A 0.37 0.46 0.32 13 1807 28 11 17 0 15
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5
4JRC_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 609 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 586
Total TN 62522
Total FP 628
Total FP CONTRA 110
Total FP INCONS 358
Total FP COMP 160
Total FN 380
Total Scores
MCC 0.574
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.596 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.556
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 265 10 0 10 0 7
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 152 0 0 0 0 1
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 11 0 0 11 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 3 0 0 3 0
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 422 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 2 0 0 2 0
2M58_A - 0.22 0.25 0.23 3 531 13 1 9 3 9
2RRC_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 68 1 0 0 1 0
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 2 0 0 2 0
2Y9C_V - 0.65 0.72 0.59 13 884 12 1 8 3 5
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 8 2 4 2 3
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 535 15 1 8 6 7
3AMU_B 0.50 0.58 0.44 11 1132 15 4 10 1 8
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 170 7 4 2 1 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3J0L_1 - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 472 5 0 1 4 2
3J0L_h - 0.98 0.97 1.00 31 2109 2 0 0 2 1
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 6 9 0 10
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.27 0.25 7 2222 29 4 17 8 19
3J16_L 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1136 12 4 7 1 9
3J20_0 0.66 0.71 0.63 15 1195 11 3 6 2 6
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 15 1 8 6 7
3J3D_C 0.54 0.63 0.48 12 943 13 4 9 0 7
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3J3E_7 0.55 0.56 0.54 19 2706 23 1 15 7 15
3J3F_7 0.88 0.89 0.86 32 2897 9 1 4 4 4
3J3F_8 0.14 0.21 0.10 4 4720 51 17 20 14 15
3NMU_E - 0.51 0.67 0.40 2 211 8 1 2 5 1
3R9X_C - 0.87 0.88 0.88 7 221 5 0 1 4 1
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3SIU_F - 0.53 0.63 0.50 5 135 5 2 3 0 3
3SN2_B 0.58 0.58 0.64 7 143 4 0 4 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 88 4 0 4 0 5
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 102 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3ZEX_D 0.23 0.26 0.23 9 2756 33 6 25 2 26
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6493 14 6 8 0 45
3ZND_W 0.23 0.38 0.15 3 1171 26 9 8 9 5
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.86 0.86 32 2726 9 0 5 4 5
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10
4FRG_B 0.35 0.38 0.35 9 1176 17 3 14 0 15
4FRN_A 0.09 0.11 0.10 3 1818 28 2 25 1 25
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.74 0.75 0.75 18 1058 7 1 5 1 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.29 0.23 5 600 17 0 17 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.