CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & MXScarna(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST MXScarna(20)
MCC 0.760 > 0.737
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.769 ± 0.134 > 0.721 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.744 > 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.783 > 0.783
Total TP 253 > 238
Total TN 22623 < 22642
Total FP 102 < 111
Total FP CONTRA 22 = 22
Total FP INCONS 48 > 44
Total FP COMP 32 < 45
Total FN 87 < 102
P-value 3.97503173922e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MXScarna(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MXScarna(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MXScarna(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 253
Total TN 22623
Total FP 102
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.760
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.769 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.744
Positive Predictive Value 0.783
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J2L_3 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2986 8 0 2 6 2
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12

^top



Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 238
Total TN 22642
Total FP 111
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.737
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.721 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.783
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.73 0.72 0.76 13 340 5 0 4 1 5
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J20_0 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 1199 1 1 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.67 0.65 0.71 22 2989 11 3 6 2 12
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 6 2 1 7
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2763 13 0 4 9 6
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 1183 6 2 3 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.