CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RNAwolf
MCC 0.699 > 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.088 > 0.577 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.637 > 0.494
Positive Predictive Value 0.773 > 0.483
Total TP 761 > 590
Total TN 121148 > 120912
Total FP 337 < 767
Total FP CONTRA 63 < 164
Total FP INCONS 161 < 467
Total FP COMP 113 < 136
Total FN 434 < 605
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 761
Total TN 121148
Total FP 337
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 161
Total FP COMP 113
Total FN 434
Total Scores
MCC 0.699
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.773
Nr of predictions 60

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.84 0.73 1.00 8 154 0 0 0 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2436 4 0 4 0 29
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 424 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 539 5 0 5 0 12
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 594 0 0 0 0 0
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J0L_7 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 512 1 0 0 1 3
3J0L_2 - 0.55 0.31 1.00 8 2242 0 0 0 0 18
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_h - 0.88 0.84 0.93 27 2111 4 0 2 2 5
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J2C_M - 0.51 0.31 0.83 30 39889 12 0 6 6 66
3J2C_O - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3987 0 0 0 0 41
3J2L_3 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2986 8 0 2 6 2
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_7 0.85 0.85 0.85 29 2707 9 0 5 4 5
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3J3F_7 0.79 0.81 0.78 29 2897 10 1 7 2 7
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 36 11 13 12 10
3J3V_B 0.72 0.67 0.78 18 2633 11 1 4 6 9
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8273 33 9 22 2 34
3ZEX_G - 0.97 0.93 1.00 42 6465 10 0 0 10 3
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
3ZND_W 0.75 0.75 0.75 6 1183 13 0 2 11 2
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12
4FRN_A 0.37 0.46 0.32 13 1807 28 11 17 0 15
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5
4JRC_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 609 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 590
Total TN 120912
Total FP 767
Total FP CONTRA 164
Total FP INCONS 467
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 605
Total Scores
MCC 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.577 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.494
Positive Predictive Value 0.483
Nr of predictions 60

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.88 0.78 1.00 7 133 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.88 23 2414 11 0 3 8 6
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 423 0 0 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.48 0.45 0.56 5 198 5 0 4 1 6
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 536 11 1 7 3 7
2YIE_Z - 0.62 0.63 0.63 5 594 7 1 2 4 3
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 509 10 1 9 0 10
3J0L_2 - 0.14 0.15 0.15 4 2223 26 4 19 3 22
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 4 1 2 2
3J0L_h - 0.47 0.41 0.57 13 2117 12 1 9 2 19
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.54 0.88 7 476 5 0 1 4 6
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2C_M - 0.21 0.25 0.19 24 39797 113 35 69 9 72
3J2C_O - 0.41 0.44 0.40 18 3942 30 7 20 3 23
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 103 6 0 5 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8244 60 23 37 0 34
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.20 0.21 9 6465 37 13 20 4 36
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1828 20 1 19 0 28
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.72 0.67 0.80 16 1062 4 4 0 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 608 3 2 1 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.