CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.725 > 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.716 ± 0.123 > 0.599 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.726 > 0.588
Positive Predictive Value 0.731 > 0.708
Total TP 342 > 277
Total TN 37815 < 37892
Total FP 193 > 157
Total FP CONTRA 41 > 39
Total FP INCONS 85 > 75
Total FP COMP 67 > 43
Total FN 129 < 194
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 342
Total TN 37815
Total FP 193
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 129
Total Scores
MCC 0.725
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.716 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.726
Positive Predictive Value 0.731
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2986 8 0 2 6 2
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_7 0.85 0.85 0.85 29 2707 9 0 5 4 5
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 36 11 13 12 10
3J3F_7 0.79 0.81 0.78 29 2897 10 1 7 2 7
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
3ZND_W 0.75 0.75 0.75 6 1183 13 0 2 11 2
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 277
Total TN 37892
Total FP 157
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.599 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.588
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J20_1 0.67 0.50 0.91 10 1101 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_7 0.82 0.79 0.84 27 2709 7 0 5 2 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 3 1 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.