CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST UNAFold
MCC 0.708 > 0.688
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.089 > 0.735 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.629 < 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.803 > 0.684
Total TP 651 < 724
Total TN 102789 > 102541
Total FP 239 < 486
Total FP CONTRA 43 < 94
Total FP INCONS 117 < 241
Total FP COMP 79 < 151
Total FN 384 > 311
P-value 4.48494289621e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 651
Total TN 102789
Total FP 239
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 117
Total FP COMP 79
Total FN 384
Total Scores
MCC 0.708
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.629
Positive Predictive Value 0.803
Nr of predictions 56

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.84 0.73 1.00 8 154 0 0 0 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2436 4 0 4 0 29
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.23 0.06 1.00 1 905 0 0 0 0 17
2YIE_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 594 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 0 0 0 0 0
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.88 0.84 0.93 27 2111 4 0 2 2 5
3J0L_7 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 512 1 0 0 1 3
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.55 0.31 1.00 8 2242 0 0 0 0 18
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J2C_O - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3987 0 0 0 0 41
3J2C_M - 0.51 0.31 0.83 30 39889 12 0 6 6 66
3J2L_3 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2986 8 0 2 6 2
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8273 33 9 22 2 34
3ZEX_G - 0.97 0.93 1.00 42 6465 10 0 0 10 3
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12
4FRN_A 0.37 0.46 0.32 13 1807 28 11 17 0 15
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 724
Total TN 102541
Total FP 486
Total FP CONTRA 94
Total FP INCONS 241
Total FP COMP 151
Total FN 311
Total Scores
MCC 0.688
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.735 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.684
Nr of predictions 56

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 3 0 1 2 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 152 0 0 0 0 1
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 6 0 0 6 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.75 0.78 0.74 14 887 8 0 5 3 4
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 6 1 3 2 3
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 4 0 2 2 4
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 4 1 1 2 6
3J0L_7 - 0.66 0.70 0.64 7 508 5 2 2 1 3
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3J0L_2 - 0.30 0.31 0.31 8 2224 25 2 16 7 18
3J16_L 0.31 0.33 0.30 7 1136 16 3 13 0 14
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 6 0 5 1 5
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J2C_O - 0.60 0.61 0.60 25 3945 22 7 10 5 16
3J2C_M - 0.75 0.80 0.71 77 39816 68 13 19 36 19
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3NMU_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 213 5 0 0 5 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.49 0.50 0.50 8 1277 15 0 8 7 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.61 0.61 0.63 20 1957 13 4 8 1 13
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8255 54 17 32 5 34
3ZEX_G - 0.97 0.93 1.00 42 6465 17 0 0 17 3
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 6 0 2 4 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.48 0.46 0.52 13 1823 12 2 10 0 15
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.