CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Vsfold4
MCC 0.740 > 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.763 ± 0.090 > 0.692 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.667 > 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.828 > 0.629
Total TP 608 > 538
Total TN 61093 > 60972
Total FP 199 < 386
Total FP CONTRA 32 < 78
Total FP INCONS 94 < 239
Total FP COMP 73 > 69
Total FN 303 < 373
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 608
Total TN 61093
Total FP 199
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 94
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 303
Total Scores
MCC 0.740
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.763 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.667
Positive Predictive Value 0.828
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.84 0.73 1.00 8 154 0 0 0 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2436 4 0 4 0 29
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.23 0.06 1.00 1 905 0 0 0 0 17
2YIE_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 594 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 0 0 0 0 0
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.88 0.84 0.93 27 2111 4 0 2 2 5
3J0L_7 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 512 1 0 0 1 3
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.55 0.31 1.00 8 2242 0 0 0 0 18
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J2C_O - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3987 0 0 0 0 41
3J2L_3 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2986 8 0 2 6 2
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
3ZEX_G - 0.97 0.93 1.00 42 6465 10 0 0 10 3
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8273 33 9 22 2 34
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 538
Total TN 60972
Total FP 386
Total FP CONTRA 78
Total FP INCONS 239
Total FP COMP 69
Total FN 373
Total Scores
MCC 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.692 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.629
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 341 1 0 0 1 2
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.35 0.38 0.34 11 2408 21 7 14 0 18
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.75 0.67 0.86 12 892 4 0 2 2 6
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 6 1 3 2 3
3AMU_B 0.73 0.74 0.74 14 1138 8 0 5 3 5
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_1 - 0.26 0.23 0.33 3 475 7 2 4 1 10
3J0L_h - 0.44 0.38 0.52 12 2117 11 2 9 0 20
3J0L_7 - 0.69 0.70 0.70 7 509 4 1 2 1 3
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3J0L_2 - 0.47 0.46 0.50 12 2226 18 1 11 6 14
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2C_O - 0.33 0.32 0.36 13 3951 26 3 20 3 28
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 12 3 6 3 10
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.23 0.24 0.24 7 1504 22 5 17 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.66 0.69 0.65 11 1276 10 3 3 4 5
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 1 5 1 10
3ZEX_G - 0.31 0.29 0.34 13 6469 31 5 20 6 32
3ZEX_E - 0.12 0.15 0.11 5 8259 40 13 27 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.66 0.63 0.71 22 2765 10 4 5 1 13
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.