CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.805 > 0.575
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.149 > 0.108 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.779 > 0.356
Positive Predictive Value 0.833 < 0.929
Total TP 514 > 235
Total TN 442376 < 442740
Total FP 174 > 56
Total FP CONTRA 33 > 6
Total FP INCONS 70 > 12
Total FP COMP 71 > 38
Total FN 146 < 425
P-value 1.42300079339e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Carnac(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 514
Total TN 442376
Total FP 174
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 71
Total FN 146
Total Scores
MCC 0.805
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.779
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 235
Total TN 442740
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 425
Total Scores
MCC 0.575
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.108 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.356
Positive Predictive Value 0.929
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.22 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 14
3J20_2 0.72 0.56 0.93 231 422119 56 6 12 38 181
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.