CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & CentroidAlifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold CentroidAlifold(seed)
MCC 0.805 > 0.762
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.720 ± 0.112 > 0.617 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.784 > 0.625
Positive Predictive Value 0.827 < 0.929
Total TP 800 > 638
Total TN 473378 < 473658
Total FP 298 > 149
Total FP CONTRA 67 > 17
Total FP INCONS 100 > 32
Total FP COMP 131 > 100
Total FN 220 < 382
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 800
Total TN 473378
Total FP 298
Total FP CONTRA 67
Total FP INCONS 100
Total FP COMP 131
Total FN 220
Total Scores
MCC 0.805
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.720 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.784
Positive Predictive Value 0.827
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3E_7 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2711 2 0 0 2 4
3J3F_7 0.96 0.92 1.00 33 2901 2 0 0 2 3
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3J3V_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 26 2630 7 0 0 7 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3W1K_J 0.90 0.87 0.93 27 1649 2 1 1 0 4
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZND_W 0.26 0.38 0.19 3 1175 22 6 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4JF2_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 1064 6 2 4 0 12

^top



Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 638
Total TN 473658
Total FP 149
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 100
Total FN 382
Total Scores
MCC 0.762
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.625
Positive Predictive Value 0.929
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3J16_L 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1153 0 0 0 0 15
3J20_0 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1213 0 0 0 0 15
3J20_1 0.54 0.30 1.00 6 1106 0 0 0 0 14
3J20_2 0.88 0.85 0.92 349 421988 102 9 22 71 63
3J2L_3 0.66 0.44 1.00 15 3005 2 0 0 2 19
3J3D_C 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 962 0 0 0 0 13
3J3E_8 0.39 0.20 0.75 3 2738 1 1 0 0 12
3J3E_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2723 2 0 1 1 17
3J3F_7 0.68 0.47 1.00 17 2917 1 0 0 1 19
3J3F_8 0.62 0.47 0.82 9 4750 4 2 0 2 10
3J3V_B 0.61 0.44 0.86 12 2642 7 0 2 5 15
3UZL_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 4 1289 2 0 0 2 12
3W1K_J 0.86 0.81 0.93 25 1651 2 1 1 0 6
3W3S_B 0.80 0.70 0.92 23 1964 4 0 2 2 10
3ZEX_C 0.56 0.34 0.91 10 5363 3 1 0 2 19
3ZEX_D 0.65 0.43 1.00 15 2781 3 0 0 3 20
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 6 0 2 4 8
4A1C_3 0.66 0.43 1.00 16 2747 0 0 0 0 21
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7
4FRN_A 0.80 0.71 0.91 20 1826 2 1 1 0 8
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.