CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold CentroidFold
MCC 0.683 > 0.614
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.724 ± 0.088 > 0.687 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.677 > 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.691 > 0.631
Total TP 1319 > 1169
Total TN 970979 < 971034
Total FP 827 < 902
Total FP CONTRA 173 < 177
Total FP INCONS 416 < 507
Total FP COMP 238 > 218
Total FN 630 < 780
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1319
Total TN 970979
Total FP 827
Total FP CONTRA 173
Total FP INCONS 416
Total FP COMP 238
Total FN 630
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.724 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.677
Positive Predictive Value 0.691
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 124 3 0 0 3 1
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.66 0.76 19 2415 12 0 6 6 10
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 422 0 0 0 0 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 530 14 3 11 0 12
3J0L_2 - 0.80 0.77 0.83 20 2226 11 0 4 7 6
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J0L_h - 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 2111 2 0 0 2 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2C_M - 0.97 0.97 0.98 93 39830 38 0 2 36 3
3J2C_O - 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 3946 4 0 0 4 0
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3E_7 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2711 2 0 0 2 4
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3J3F_7 0.96 0.92 1.00 33 2901 2 0 0 2 3
3J3V_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 26 2630 7 0 0 7 1
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W1K_J 0.90 0.87 0.93 27 1649 2 1 1 0 4
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_H - 0.29 0.37 0.24 7 3596 27 7 15 5 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 16 0 4 12 4
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.23 0.23 81 420993 296 62 216 18 265
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZEX_E - 0.12 0.15 0.10 5 8255 44 20 24 0 29
3ZEX_G - 0.32 0.31 0.33 14 6465 35 10 18 7 31
3ZND_W 0.26 0.38 0.19 3 1175 22 6 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 1064 6 2 4 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 608 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1169
Total TN 971034
Total FP 902
Total FP CONTRA 177
Total FP INCONS 507
Total FP COMP 218
Total FN 780
Total Scores
MCC 0.614
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.687 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.631
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.86 0.89 25 2412 8 0 3 5 4
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 424 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 538 6 0 6 0 12
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.31 0.28 8 2221 24 2 19 3 18
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.36 0.50 4 403 5 3 1 1 7
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.89 0.88 0.90 28 2109 5 0 3 2 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J16_L 0.59 0.57 0.63 12 1140 7 0 7 0 9
3J20_2 0.70 0.69 0.70 286 421962 177 23 97 57 126
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2C_M - 0.60 0.60 0.60 58 39829 58 14 24 20 38
3J2C_O - 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 3950 6 0 0 6 4
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 15 1 9 5 8
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 2726 22 4 10 8 13
3J3E_7 0.61 0.59 0.65 20 2710 13 2 9 2 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 37 12 11 14 10
3J3F_7 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 2896 9 1 6 2 5
3J3V_B 0.72 0.74 0.71 20 2628 16 1 7 8 7
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 30 1959 1 0 0 1 3
3ZEX_H - 0.27 0.37 0.21 7 3591 27 16 11 0 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 9 0 4 5 4
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.34 0.67 10 5359 6 1 4 1 19
3ZEX_B - 0.27 0.25 0.31 85 421074 210 38 155 17 261
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2763 8 0 3 5 5
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8255 51 19 30 2 34
3ZEX_G - 0.45 0.44 0.47 20 6464 32 6 17 9 25
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.61 0.57 0.67 4 214 2 0 2 0 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.80 0.71 0.91 20 1826 2 1 1 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5
4JRC_A - 0.38 0.41 0.39 7 604 11 0 11 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.