CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Contrafold
MCC 0.680 > 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.746 ± 0.095 > 0.709 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.671 > 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.689 > 0.580
Total TP 1135 > 1026
Total TN 948883 > 948760
Total FP 707 < 966
Total FP CONTRA 137 < 193
Total FP INCONS 375 < 551
Total FP COMP 195 < 222
Total FN 556 < 665
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1135
Total TN 948883
Total FP 707
Total FP CONTRA 137
Total FP INCONS 375
Total FP COMP 195
Total FN 556
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.746 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.671
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 124 3 0 0 3 1
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.66 0.76 19 2415 12 0 6 6 10
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
3J0L_h - 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 2111 2 0 0 2 3
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_2 - 0.80 0.77 0.83 20 2226 11 0 4 7 6
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3J2C_O - 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 3946 4 0 0 4 0
3J2C_M - 0.97 0.97 0.98 93 39830 38 0 2 36 3
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 16 0 4 12 4
3ZEX_G - 0.32 0.31 0.33 14 6465 35 10 18 7 31
3ZEX_E - 0.12 0.15 0.10 5 8255 44 20 24 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.23 0.23 81 420993 296 62 216 18 265
3ZEX_H - 0.29 0.37 0.24 7 3596 27 7 15 5 12
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1026
Total TN 948760
Total FP 966
Total FP CONTRA 193
Total FP INCONS 551
Total FP COMP 222
Total FN 665
Total Scores
MCC 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.709 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.580
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.90 0.87 26 2410 11 0 4 7 3
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.88 0.88 28 2108 6 0 4 2 4
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 3 0 1 2 3
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 1 0 0 1 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 512 7 1 6 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.53 0.55 0.55 6 400 6 3 2 1 5
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.31 0.28 8 2221 26 2 19 5 18
3J16_L 0.55 0.57 0.55 12 1137 10 3 7 0 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 5 0 0 5 0
3J20_0 0.53 0.57 0.50 12 1195 13 3 9 1 9
3J20_2 0.70 0.72 0.69 296 421939 197 27 106 64 116
3J2C_O - 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 3947 7 0 1 6 2
3J2C_M - 0.57 0.63 0.52 60 39809 77 21 35 21 36
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 16 1 9 6 8
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
3UZL_B 0.90 0.88 0.93 14 1278 8 0 1 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 9 0 4 5 4
3ZEX_G - 0.35 0.38 0.34 17 6457 42 9 24 9 28
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8251 58 20 33 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
3ZEX_B - 0.26 0.27 0.25 92 420991 302 58 211 33 254
3ZEX_H - 0.24 0.37 0.17 7 3583 35 22 13 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.34 0.37 10 5347 23 4 13 6 19
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4A1C_3 0.81 0.81 0.81 30 2726 10 0 7 3 7
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ATO_G - 0.52 0.57 0.50 4 212 4 0 4 0 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.73 0.71 0.77 17 1180 5 3 2 0 7
4FRN_A 0.74 0.71 0.77 20 1822 6 1 5 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.